• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

A counselor on the bridge makes sense if it’s a ship of exploration that would benefit from facilitation services with new life from new civilizations.

If, on the other hand, it’s a military man o’ war that ignores Code 710 and warning buoys so as to enforce the manifest destiny of a benevolent federation, well….
YqI8Q0d.jpg

And then there’s the question of whether the counselor bills hourly or if she is working to better herself and the rest of humanity.
 
Kind of like M'Benga in TOS. He's had only two appearances in the franchise to date but when he did show up he made it count.
 
If, on the other hand, it’s a military man o’ war that ignores Code 710 and warning buoys so as to enforce the manifest destiny of a benevolent federation, well….

Ah, manifest destiny. Amazing how something that is pure evil could be made to sound so heroic and adventurous. Maybe our ancestors saw ourselves as something like the Federation, spreading the light of civilization to the far shores... no matter how much land we had to steal, people we had to kill, or cultures we had to obliterate in the process.
 
Ah, manifest destiny. Amazing how something that is pure evil could be made to sound so heroic and adventurous. Maybe our ancestors saw ourselves as something like the Federation, spreading the light of civilization to the far shores... no matter how much land we had to steal, people we had to kill, or cultures we had to obliterate in the process.

Ah, likle the British empire
 
I agree that a counselor is an appropriate role but not necessarily as a bridge officer.
My guess has always been that she was there because 1) she and Riker were initially based on Decker & Ilia because IIRC what became TMP was originally the pitch for TNG and Gene(?) wanted a "star-crossed" couple and 2) to have another woman on the bridge (it was the 80s).
 
My guess has always been that she was there because 1) she and Riker were initially based on Decker & Ilia because IIRC what became TMP was originally the pitch for TNG and Gene(?) wanted a "star-crossed" couple and 2) to have another woman on the bridge (it was the 80s).
That's a reasonable guess to my mind.
 
The apple didn't fall far from the tree, did it?

Maybe that's why the Federation has the non-interference rules that it does... it acknowledges the mistakes of its forbears and is determined not to repeat them.

Quite possibly.

I mean I know the history of my birth country and what the British did to it and it wasn't pretty.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top