The rest is just mental masturbation.
Mental masturbation is our business. That's what this BBS is all about. It's why we're on it!
The rest is just mental masturbation.
Mental masturbation is our business. That's what this BBS is all about. It's why we're on it!
that's why they made you a cop - no imaginationNot me.
I’m here for Power and Glory!
I guess it is up in the air, based on onscreen canon. Certainly the characters who have been identified as Starfleet Commander-in-Chief onscreen like Admiral Bill, Admiral Clancy and Admiral Vance are implied to be the head of Starfleet, and Clancy definitely wears a Fleet Admiral's insignia, making her I think the only five star officer we see in the 24th century, which would seem to support the idea. On the other hand, Admiral Vance seems a bit too hands on for the head of Starfleet, giving Captains their assignments direct, though for all I know that could be a result of Starfleet being a smaller organization in the 32nd century.Thanks. So it looks like we don't know for sure if a C-in-C is the top Starfleet honcho? As opposed to a fleet or regional commander or something like that?
Thanks. So it looks like we don't know for sure if a C-in-C is the top Starfleet honcho? As opposed to a fleet or regional commander or something like that?
I guess it is up in the air, based on onscreen canon. Certainly the characters who have been identified as Starfleet Commander-in-Chief onscreen like Admiral Bill, Admiral Clancy and Admiral Vance are implied to be the head of Starfleet, and Clancy definitely wears a Fleet Admiral's insignia, making her I think the only five star officer we see in the 24th century, which would seem to support the idea. On the other hand, Admiral Vance seems a bit too hands on for the head of Starfleet, giving Captains their assignments direct, though for all I know that could be a result of Starfleet being a smaller organization in the 32nd century.
The novels do go with the idea the Commander-in-Chief is the head of Starfleet, for whatever that's worth.
The novels do go with the idea the Commander-in-Chief is the head of Starfleet, for whatever that's worth.
in ww I every german division had a chief of staff but so had the imperial armyAs I noted up thread that's not entirely consistent even within TrekLit.
BotF uses Chief of Staff for the Federation Starfleet, with several sub-ordinate Chiefs of Staff for different functions.
Some TrekLit -- particularly 23rd C favours CinC of Starfleet -- whereas the 24th C material mainly used "Commander, Starfleet" before transitioning towards the end to "Chief Admiral".
It's entirely plausible for the Federation President to be the commander-in-chief of all Federation armed forces, and for the head admiral to be entitled the Commander-in-Chief of the Federation Starfleet. The Starfleet C-in-C would still report to the President.
And there's also the Federation Naval Patrol to consider. Presumably their top Admiral would also report to the President.
Militias. States’ rights. Keep and bear arms. It’s in the constitution.True. Though to be honest, I haven't the faintest notion why an interstellar federal republic has its own navy instead of leaving each member world to run their own surface-based navy.
Perhaps most planets do have their own navies, but Earth, as the capital world of the UFP, is a special exception and their surface defense also falls under UFP jurisdiction. When they thought the Founders had infiltrated Earth, Starfleet Security was out patrolling the tiny side streets in New Orleans, not a local patrol.True. Though to be honest, I haven't the faintest notion why an interstellar federal republic has its own navy instead of leaving each member world to run their own surface-based navy.
Perhaps most planets do have their own navies, but Earth, as the capital world of the UFP, is a special exception and their surface defense also falls under UFP jurisdiction. When they thought the Founders had infiltrated Earth, Starfleet Security was out patrolling the tiny side streets in New Orleans, not a local patrol.
True. Though to be honest, I haven't the faintest notion why an interstellar federal republic has its own navy instead of leaving each member world to run their own surface-based navy.
Short Answer: NO
Long answer: Have I posted on this subject before? Can't remember. But I have been watching TNG episodes with my grandparents during our quarantine, and Picard LITERALLY SAYS in the Season 2 episode "Peak Performance" that Starfleet IS NOT a military. The exact quote is "Starfleet is not a military organization. Its purpose is exploration." Whatever may have been the case in TOS, in TNG it is explicitly stated that Starfleet is not a military organization.
especially as both riker and picard might have made the claim for the sole reason to have an excuse if they fuck up war games with a master strategistAnd that claim of Picard's is contradicted by the fact that Starfleet operates a system of courts-martial, and by the definition of "military" which Starfleet fulfills to a "T." Please do read through the whole thread instead of digging up the same argument that has been debunked multiple times.
Some TrekLit -- particularly 23rd C favours CinC of Starfleet -- whereas the 24th C material mainly used "Commander, Starfleet" before transitioning towards the end to "Chief Admiral".
The exact quote is "Starfleet is not a military organization. Its purpose is exploration." Whatever may have been the case in TOS, in TNG it is explicitly stated that Starfleet is not a military organization.
Short answer: yes, it is a military. Just because characters say something doesn't make it accurate.Short Answer: NO
Long answer: Have I posted on this subject before? Can't remember. But I have been watching TNG episodes with my grandparents during our quarantine, and Picard LITERALLY SAYS in the Season 2 episode "Peak Performance" that Starfleet IS NOT a military. The exact quote is "Starfleet is not a military organization. Its purpose is exploration." Whatever may have been the case in TOS, in TNG it is explicitly stated that Starfleet is not a military organization.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.