Pretty standard.
The last major push for Star Trek merchandise was for Star Trek 2009. Since then, it's become increasingly insular (hard to find & narrow-marketed), IMO.The merch for these new shows has been dismal so far. If it wasn’t for Eaglemoss, there would be nothing
Supposedly Beyond was merched to hell and back in China tho. I've seen... trading cards. But heard there was lots and lots more.The last major push for Star Trek merchandise was for Star Trek 2009. Since then, it's become increasingly insular (hard to find & narrow-marketed), IMO.
Sad but true. The sales appeared to be hit and miss (despite seemingly selling well in my local market) so much so that the second wave was cancelled, more's the pity. Given that even McFarlane was not really willing to try and clear hurdles with the Discovery Phaser to be CA compliant for replica firearms is not a good indication of confidence in the Star Trek merchandising side of things.The last major push for Star Trek merchandise was for Star Trek 2009. Since then, it's become increasingly insular (hard to find & narrow-marketed), IMO.
Yeah we doWe don’t need Lower Decks merchandise.
Yeah we do
We don't need any merchandise. But, since Star Trek merchandise is being produced it would be nice to have so people can have fun with their favorite shows.We don’t need Lower Decks merchandise.
Hasbro is willing to suffer losses and certainly are not favored, especially in the Star Wars collecting community. Playmates may have missteped but that doesn't mean they should immediately follow Hasbro's example.Like it or not, Hasbro still knows not to do what Playmates did.
It's a ship. Whether it's "live action" or "animated" doesn't impact its appearance at all.How would you get the animated Cerritos to fit into a shelf display featuring live-action models if they’ve yet to design a canon live-action version?
Other way around. Hasbro shouldn't follow Playmates' example. It can kill an entire toyline and leave collectors with nothing but incomplete collections.Hasbro is willing to suffer losses and certainly are not favored, especially in the Star Wars collecting community. Playmates may have missteped but that doesn't mean they should immediately follow Hasbro's example.
Neither should follow either example. They should at least try and learn from past mistakes and study the market of their respective lines. Playmates, thus far, seems incapable of doing so. Hasbro, I'll admit, is slowly learning some of their errors from the handling of SW. Slowly, but still some indication of possible insight.Other way around. Hasbro shouldn't follow Playmates' example. It can kill an entire toyline and leave collectors with nothing but incomplete collections.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.