Yes. That's exactly what has happened.Oh, so Barrowman was already "exposed" in the media many, many years ago, though Noel Clarke somehow kept under the radar all this time.
Yes. That's exactly what has happened.Oh, so Barrowman was already "exposed" in the media many, many years ago, though Noel Clarke somehow kept under the radar all this time.
Some of them have, including at least one in the article quoted.The main defence of Barrowman, that everyone thought it was good fun and no one ever complained, has now been finally shot down by the reveal enough people did complain at the time for a formal disciplinary to happen.
Will buy the no one took it as more than a joke gone to far idea if some of the people who actually complained back it up.
"Unnamed actor" really? So is the Guardian making shit up now or is the actor Billie Piper?
I should think even if we include all the women who were in episodes with Noel Clarke, that's still a somewhat limited pool, even assuming this isn't Billie Piper or Camille Corduri, that doesn't really leave very many other possibilities.If we assume this actor was in more than one episode and across seasons that's a very limited pool of women?
Context is important. By the time Barrowman arrived on set, Eccleston had already dealt with a few months worth of behind the scenes bullshit, was being pressured into making a decision about returning for the second season or not, and his father was terminally ill and due to the production schedule, Eccleston wasn't able to visit him. In light of all that, can you really blame Eccleston for being grumpy?in this VERY old article, John Barrowman claimed Chris Eccleston was "grumpy"
It means it's someone who doesn't want their identity revealed. But if anonymous screams fake to you, there is also at least one named woman who worked on Doctor Who behind the scenes back then who makes allegations against Clarke mentioned in that article."Unnamed actor" really? So is the Guardian making shit up now or is the actor Billie Piper?
Context is important. By the time Barrowman arrived on set, Eccleston had already dealt with a few months worth of behind the scenes bullshit, was being pressured into making a decision about returning for the second season or not, and his father was terminally ill and due to the production schedule, Eccleston wasn't able to visit him. In light of all that, can you really blame Eccleston for being grumpy?
It means it's someone who doesn't want their identity revealed. But if anonymous screams fake to you, there is also at least one named woman who worked on Doctor Who behind the scenes back then who makes allegations against Clarke mentioned in that article.
As opposed to all those beautiful male actresses?a beautiful female actress like Karen Gillan
As for Clarke terrible stuff and show's no lessons have been learnt from Saville a decade later. In particular that people still don't feel able to report problems.
There was an old quote from Freema doing the rounds where she talks about how anyone new on Torchwood (including her) would be freaked out by the penis waggling whilst all the old hands were non plussed.
The word "woke" is an insult because it implies that everyone else is "asleep".
That part where you saidI do not think any of the accusations are fake
suggests otherwise.is the Guardian making shit up
That part where you said
suggests otherwise.
crude behaviour on old NuWho productions were A) already fairly well known about for years and years if you knew where to look and B) were already settled amongst the affected parties, with Barrowman apologising and his "victims" rolling their eyes or even laughing it off.
Yeah, Barrowman's antics have always been publicly known.
This is quite literally making a mountain out of a mole hill. As has already been stated, the only thing we have proof of regarding Barrowman is that he is an immature goof.
Chris Eccelston didn't intentionallg bad mouth anybody, but in this VERY old article, John Barrowman claimed Chris Eccleston was "grumpy" (Eccleston also felt the production was stressful, overstreched and chaotic for the opening season, with one producer in particular being very arrogant/unprofessional towards cast, crew, and extras, etc). Nothing hinted about Noel Clarke in S1/2. He got into a shouting match with RTD over Cardiff's early NuWho facilities being inadequate.
I've got a gut feeling Noel Clarke got worse around Kidulthood.
I wouldn't say Barrowman's behaviour was appropriate, though it seemed more like idiotic exhibition than sexual attacks.
RTD should've threatened Barrowman with being recast/fired at the time (ie. TARDIS Rose didn't resurrect him), mind you, though at the time it could've cost the crew more time and money they didn't have in their make or break first series.
Barrowman should have been fired on the spot and reported to the police the very first time he did that crap on the Doctor Who set. You don't whip your dick out and plop it on people in the work place.
The go to shithouse excuses of "He was just goofing around so it was okay".
Sorry, making excuses for sexual assault of any kind is why these fuckwits think its A-okay to be skeevy shit bags.
Matt Smith's opening season actually had a somewhat reduced budget than the Tennant years, though it's been reported that since 2005, adjusted to inflation, Doctor Who has an average budget of 1.5 million pounds per episode - not on a total shoestring like DW serials from many decades ago, and perhaps roughly equivalent to Berman era Star Trek, but definitely dwarfed by Star Trek Discovery and Game Of Thrones mini-movie production budgets.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.