Translation: you are still the homophobic creature you've always been by continuing to push a completely unsubstantiated, hate-motivated fantasy about the Oscars,
and shit on the legacy and memory of a dead man, which in turn, is based on your woefully unhealthy hatred of DC movies and a need to "get back" at anyone who "dares" to criticize Marvel movies. It is no wonder other members have posted that you need to seek professional help
That you continue to post about real subjects you have no business, historic or personal knowledge about / making excuses based on fantasies shows how subversive you really are. Again, toddle off, child.
They're probably about as physically fit and well trained as a person can be without actually being "an enhanced". They didn't beat Walker because they were super-soldiers (because they're not) they beat him because 1) they fought as a cohesive unit, not a group of individuals and 2) US military training doesn't produce the be-all, end-all, best-of-the-best world beaters that the recruitment videos claim. He'd have been out of his league with just ONE of them. And they were being gentle too; he still had a pulse when they left the room.Are we sure that the Dora Mailaje are not super soldiers?
Translation: you are still the homophobic creature you've always been by continuing to push a completely unsubstantiated, hate-motivated fantasy about the Oscars, and shit on the legacy and memory of a dead man, which in turn, is based on your woefully unhealthy hatred of DC movies and a need to "get back" at anyone who "dares" to criticize Marvel movies. It is no wonder other members have posted that you need to seek professional help.
That you continue to post about real subjects you have no business, historic or personal knowledge about / making excuses based on fantasies shows how subversive you really are. Again, toddle off, child.
Nah, just the truth about how they wanted to but couldn't because of controversy and chose an easier option. And I'm not alone. You see me complaining about Hoffman winning for playing a homosexual?
See, now you're just going too hard into that "Dead Artists are Better" cliche. Folks thought Ledger was a talentless pretty boy before he did Brokeback and then Dark Knight made it taboo to every say anything bad about him at all. Unrealistic. His "Joker" wasn't even the Joker anyways.
Sorry, I'm not a white guy so you can kindly take off with the patronizing. Get with the times.
Oh, and you're continuing to say nothing about the Cultists who did a REAL attack and did REAL damage. Says enough about you.
Tough, it's the truth. But yes, I still do believe that the Academy only gave Ledger the award cause he died and because it would've been too controversial to give it to him for Brokeback when you remember the "Moral" outrage about that movie when it first came out. They took the easy way out with Capote, as that was another Oscar Bait biopic.
As for you blaming activists for stuff, they're nothing compared to the lunatic cultists who attempted an armed insurrection against the lawful government. That you ignore them shows your alignment.
I'm wondering if things would be more black and white if a congressperson or Mike Pense had been killed?
Is there the death penalty in Washington DC?
Nope.
Although a lot of those scumbags traveled.
If you can establish criminal intent out of state where there is the death penalty you can move the trial there, and sort an execution.
I don't know if the government will turn on Walker. The show has been exploring a lot of racial themes and having an authority figure kill an unarmed man graphically on camera and having that murder justified in the eyes of the law and certain political groups would certainly fit in.Holy shit - they're going to take the shield from him - by force!
That'll be one hell of a fight but would that mean they will be on the run again from the law? I hope not, the MCU has been there and done that but the government also doesn't like to put up against the wall. They know they have to decommission Walker, his actions made him un-employable by the government, possibly even a legal issue. But even then they can't allow rogue elements to beat up a government operative and steal government property, much less a national treasure.
I guess it depends on how much the public would be told (and sold). Seems to me saying Walker was neutralizing a threat by super-powered terrorists that just killed Battlestar with their bare hands might be justification enough for the public. That this guy still posed an active threat to the public-at-large with his strength alone despite being unarmed wouldn't be wrong even if that wasn't what really motivated Walker.
As a certain poster in this thread has already proved.There will undoubtedly be people who actually APPLAUD what he did if they present any kind of 'realistic' take on how people would respond in OUR world vs the MCU.
As a certain poster in this thread has already proved.
I don't disagree, but at the same time from an in-universe perspective, after all the fuss that was kicked up with the Sokovia accords and legislating what "superheroes" are and are not allowed to do, you gotta imagine there's something in there about NOT murdering unarmed suspects of foreign soil.I don't know if the government will turn on Walker. The show has been exploring a lot of racial themes and having an authority figure kill an unarmed man graphically on camera and having that murder justified in the eyes of the law and certain political groups would certainly fit in.
I don't disagree, but at the same time from an in-universe perspective, after all the fuss that was kicked up with the Sokovia accords and legislating what "superheroes" are and are not allowed to do, you gotta imagine there's something in there about NOT murdering unarmed suspects of foreign soil.
I mean it'd be one thing if this was on US soil then the allegory would be self evident. But this has a much more international dimension to it that makes me think it's less about US domestic issues and more about imperialism in general. Not that they're mutually exclusive or even unrelated, I'm just thinking in terms of the show's focus when there's only a few more episodes to go.
My thoughts exactly - Walker killed a guy in public who was already beaten and laying on the ground with the symbol of american values and morals that the US loves to point out ( Land of the Free and all that). He didn't just use the Shield to bash him to the ground and knock him out ( that would be PR gold - Captain America apprehends Terrorist) but he killed with something that is as well known as Coca Cola, Apple Phones and McDonalds in the MCU.
I doubt the government has any chance to spin this any way, they have to let Walker go but apart from the trailer we don't know how that will happen or if Bucky and Sam will preempt the government's reaction and take matters into their own hands ( and possibly be then celebrated as heroes because they took down a man they lost control over).
4 more days to find out![]()
Sorry I was inching towards this...
Who is behind Captain America II?
The Executive branch of the US Government.
The DOD or the US Army?
Or the GRC.
I'm assuming that there are American representatives on the GRC steering the power of that body towards positive US outcomes.
I'm also sure that UnAmerican or merely non American representatives have been given control over aspects of the American Government, and the country.
Anyone think they are setting up the early hints of Thunderbolts? There was a rumor (2 years ago) that it was in the pipeline. Starting with Zemo and bring in General Ross, Justin Hammer, Abomination, maybe the Mandarin?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.