• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

What are your controversial Star Trek opinions?

Sigh all you want, it does happen. Probably quite often, given that people get crushes regardless of inclination, either their own or the other person's. Is it really that different from having a crush on an opposite sex person and finding out that she's got a boyfriend? Unavailable is unavailable.
....

Indeed, like Picard and Beverly Crusher for example...
 
For some reason, Spock refers to them as "marshmelons." There's a non-canonical explanation for why on the Marshmallow page at Memory Alpha: https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Marshmallow.
The novelization has that McCoy's practical joke was extensive enough to include the sing-a-long. By the time they got back to their vacation at the end, Spock had learned of McCoy's joke, and learned how to play 'Row, row, row your boat' on his Vulcan lyre to make the effort more practical than joke. He also learned the correct pronunciation of marshmallow.
 
The novelization has that McCoy's practical joke was extensive enough to include the sing-a-long. By the time they got back to their vacation at the end, Spock had learned of McCoy's joke, and learned how to play 'Row, row, row your boat' on his Vulcan lyre to make the effort more practical than joke. He also learned the correct pronunciation of marshmallow.

That's the "in-universe" explanation. I wonder if they did it on purpose or if they were actually mistaken as to the correct pronunciation of "marshmallow"...
 
That's the "in-universe" explanation. I wonder if they did it on purpose or if they were actually mistaken as to the correct pronunciation of "marshmallow"...
Well, since the novelization is usually adapted from one or more earlier drafts of the shooting script, it's likely to be intentional.
 
Didn't they actually merchandise those "marshmellons"? Maybe that had something to do with it. Or maybe they thought it was a cute future distortion of the name?
 
Kraft released a plastic marshmallow dispenser that you could get through the company and with proofs-of-purchase from their products(?).
 
Which straw broke the camel's back?
Honestly, it was the whole trying to cram so much into every season. It's like they can't pick what to focus on, and here I've been defending it like my life depended on it. No. Either have a Klingon Arc or a Mirror Arc, not both. Either be about Religion or be about Control, not both. It's ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, it was the whole trying to cram so much into every season. It's like they can't pick what to focus on, and here I've been defending it like my life depended on it. No. Either have a Klingon Arc or a Mirror Arc, not both. Either be about Religion or be about Control, not both. It's ridiculous.

I'm hoping it will settle down next season. I think they should have started from the 32nd century in the first place personally. I think like any other Trek it has it's good and bad. The lack of a cohesive Captain has done it no favours and again, hopefully that'll balance out in the 4th season.
 
Writing a story where someone's premonitions come true is bad science and thus bad science fiction.

If it's because they have psychic powers sure (though the ship sailed long ago on that one for Star Trek), but sometimes peoples intuition or guess is correct. I agree though that people treating that comment as a prophecy is odd.

The Return of Kirk novels actually give a reason for Kirk believing this.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top