• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

2021 books announced

2. I've always like the usage of "S/he" and "Hir" with respect to hermaphrotitic species. And I think I may have even used that convention myself, in some science fiction short story (probably in my own "First Contact Corps" milieu) that I wrote for a class at a local junior college.
Amusingly, I remember that one short story plot point where Burgoyne was annoyed at being assumed to automatically feel camaraderie with a member of an agender species, as Hermats took pride in the idea of "being both, not neither".
 
Krenim, and maybe Q?
I think we can be pretty sure the Krenim are involved. A while back someone posted a quote from an interview Kirsten Beyer did where she said her last Voyager novel set up stuff for future books, and I haven't read it yet, but I believe it deals with the Krenim and left the stuff involving them unresolved.
 
The DTI really want to contact the Krenim for some reason even though they've started they'll attack any federation ship entering their space.

Or something like that.
 
I always read it as pronounced the same as “here,” pretty much for that reason.

Which is just as confusing in its own way. These things don't work unless they're commonly understood and accepted, and none of the neologisms people have coined as gender-neutral pronouns have gained such widespread acceptance. The advantage of singular "they" is that it's always been in common usage. People may have been falsely taught that it was bad grammar, but it's familiar enough vernacular that people understand it when they hear it (just as they understand "ain't" or "would of").
 
Agreed. No idea how you’d pronounce s/he and with my accent (north east England) her and hir would be indistinguishable

I recall "hir" being used by Leslie Fish in her Andorian fanfic, in which she gave the species three genders (long before Data's comment in TNG).

I thought that "hir" was more of a written term, similar to when women began using the term "Ms" on documents (ie. eliminating the "Mr" within the term "Mrs"). I recall "wimmin" (as in "Wimmin's Comix", thus eliminating the "men" from "women")?

The pronunciation was not originally different, although people did move towards emphasising "Ms" more distinctly as "Mz".
 
I recall "wimmin" (as in "Wimmin's Comix", thus eliminating the "men" from "women")?

Back in high school, my sister went through a radical feminist phase where she favored the spelling "womyn."


The pronunciation was not originally different, although people did move towards emphasising "Ms" more distinctly as "Mz".

I thought it was always pronounced that way. Also in high school, I had a substitute math teacher who insisted that she was "Miss, not Ms." (pronounced "Miz") to make it clear that she was single and looking. (Not at her students, of course.)

These days, it seems to me that people tend to pronounce "Ms." indistinguishably from "Miss."
 
Cool, I've been hoping we'd get something covering the Burnham's year in the 32nd Century before Discovery arrive.
Shadows of Have Offended sounds like it could be interesting. I have to admit though, it sounds like a bit more of a planet of the week kind of story than I was expecting.
I always read it as pronounced the same as “here,” pretty much for that reason.
Me too. I've always assumed it was meant to be a combination of her and he. I've never understood why Peter David didn't just go with they, it would have been a lot easier to deal with.
 
The next Discovery novel is by Una McCormack and is about Burnham’s first year in the future. So that should be fun:

https://www.amazon.ca/Star-Trek-Discovery-Wonderlands-7/dp/1982157542
Huh. So I guess the previously announced placeholder DTP was in fact Discovery Trade Paperback rather than an abbreviation of the title as I had believed:
Not likely. Based on prior precedent, these are always abbreviations of the titles. For example, the upcoming Picard novel The Dark Veil had previously been listed as TDV and the upcoming DS9 novel Revenant is currently listed as STR (which in that case would mean Star Trek Revenant). Given they've been following this pattern for at least the past year, I find it more likely DTP is an abbreviation of the title rather than Discovery Trade Paperback.
 
The next Discovery novel is by Una McCormack and is about Burnham’s first year in the future. So that should be fun:

https://www.amazon.ca/Star-Trek-Discovery-Wonderlands-7/dp/1982157542

we also got a plot description for Shadows Have offended:
https://www.amazon.ca/Shadows-Have-Offended-Cassandra-Clarke/dp/1982154047

Good spot! Both seem like interesting tales. Plus another revealed title and blurb on the S&S website - the novel originally listed as OATW is now Living Memory, by Christopher; another in his movie-era works. Blurb follows:

An all-new Star Trek movie-era adventure!

While attempting to settle in as commandant of Starfleet Academy, Admiral James T. Kirk must suddenly contend with the controversial, turbulent integration of an alien warrior caste into the student body—and quickly becomes embroiled in conflict when the Academy controversy escalates to murder. Meanwhile, Captain Spock of the USS Enterprise and Commander Pavel Chekov of the USS Reliant are investigating a series of powerful cosmic storms seemingly targeting Federation worlds—unstoppable outbursts emitting from the very fabric of space. Endeavoring to predict where the lethal storms will strike next, Spock and Chekov make the shocking discovery that the answer lies in Commander Nyota Uhura’s past—one that she no longer remembers….
 
Both will be day 1 purchases for me (though, on this site, I'm guessing, this will not be a rare occurrence). Thank you very much for posting this news!
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top