so is it safe to say that we went from “Superman 1” to “Superman 3” with this movie in terms of quality?
Yep, the first half was very 80's.My quick take: instead of making a movie set in the 80s, they made an 80s movie...
As cheesy as it is, a tiny part of me is kind of hoping they take a page out of the Lynda Carter series playbook, and have Diana run into Steve's nephew, also named Steve and played by Chris Pine in the next movie.
- And it might be in the comics but I am not sure how I feel about WW flying like Superman. It just does not really feel like a power WW should have IMO.
Well, considering she's had it since 1946 (https://dc.fandom.com/wiki/Wonder_Woman_Vol_1_20), I'd say that the boat's sailed on that one.
Here's the funny thing: I've seen this handled before by having host body be someone who recently died, for example Lucifer's mom in Season 2 I think it was.Jenkins and Johns will never address how immoral that was at all. In fact, no one in today's entertainment business and news media is likely to address that (in any serious manner or at all), unless the roles were reversed and a male hero had sex with the possessed body of a woman. Then, and only then would it be considered immoral and possibly charged with advocating something darker. The basic morality play about desire was in place, but, there are no moral repercussions for what Diana did with the man's body. None.
Yes, I am aware of all of that, which is I said a tiny part of me almost wishes. I would just like to see her get a happy ending with Steve, and since they're probably not going to bring back Steve the first again, then a new one could be a good back up.That was an assbrained decision for the Carter TV series, and it would be just as bad if the DCEU mirrored that unbelievable act of plotting convenience. Diana revoking her wish and the pain it caused was a lesson she needed to learn; having a Trevor look-alike (or relative) show up would not only be ridiculous, but toss the lesson about the price of selfish desire and sacrifice taught to her in this story.
I think they played at least a couple times during some of the action scenes.I don’t remember hearing her theme throughout the movie?
No, the bad guy was Maxwell Lord, a mortal business man. And if you are referring to the person who made the stone, that was the Duke of Deception, who is a minion of Ares in the comics.The bad guy was Loki, right?
A trickster god of lies with many names.
Wow, we couldn't possibly have more different rankings.My ranking so far:
MoS
BvS
WW
Aquaman
Shazam
WW84
Suicide Squad
Justice League
Birds of Prey
Should’ve streamed on Hallmark Channel. I guess it’s competently helmed but I just don’t really think there’s any point coming back to this one again.
Terrible FM sound at the drive-in (it was fine when we saw "Bill & Ted Face the Music" a few months ago, at least after the main feature started). I had quite liked the first "Wonder Woman" and Gal Gadot was the best thing about "Batman vs Superman".
We had no idea why anything was happening in "WW84"! Too many long, dialogue-free action sequences and I think I totally missed how Kristen Wiig turned into Cheetah, and why, and even where she went. And why Steve Trevor was back from the dead. Or any of Max Lord's dialogue.
When the best things about a movie are the choctop ice cream and the retro cameo (in the post-credits sequence) there is a problem.
That's cool that you saw it at a drive-in! Wish I was near one
There was a magic wishing gem, that was practically a genie.
'Cos I wish it had been in the movie. Honestly, I did not understand one line of dialogue that came out of Max Lord's mouth. I only knew his named was "Max Lord" from the closeup on his business card, and then checking IMDb this morning.
Everyone gets one wish, but the gem exacts a detrimental payment in exchange for the wish.
Except for some people like Wiig's character, who gets two without explanation.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.