I've been toying with the idea of Ashley Judd reprising her TNG role as Robin Lefler for Lower Decks, and I think it'd be interesting if she's an older, more experienced officer, perhaps even a seasoned Captain. What do you think?
I've been toying with the idea of Ashley Judd reprising her TNG role as Robin Lefler for Lower Decks, and I think it'd be interesting if she's an older, more experienced officer, perhaps even a seasoned Captain. What do you think?
I don't understand the question. It sounds like a needless limitation. The TNG episode "Conspiracy" had FOUR captains in the same scene.You already have two older, seasoned captains in the show. Why would you need Robin Lefler?
Too many captains spoil the soup.You already have two older, seasoned captains in the show. Why would you need Robin Lefler?
I don't understand the question. It sounds like a needless limitation. The TNG episode "Conspiracy" had FOUR captains in the same scene.
Indeed, yes. The fan wank has to stop.Because you had a story that required Picard meet with other command officers, not so someone can fap it to fanwank.
Indeed, yes. The fan wank has to stop.
The Cage said:You just sit, living and reliving other lives left behind in the thought record.
No, I don't think so. But, I think that is all the fans are willing to buy at this point.It is really all the franchise has left in its collective tank.
No, I don't think so. But, I think that is all the fans are willing to buy at this point.
Ok...still didn't feel like the same, and I thought it could have done a whole more. I think it has dared to touch on some themes but then shrunk back. Trek could do more than just nostalgia but it fears to do so because it gets bitten back so hard. Things like LD and fan films get praised for Gene's Vision adherence. Is there any great surprise on falling back on familiar tones?I mean, you have to look at the premiere of Discovery, the franchise had about four hundred episodes (I'm thinking it is actually more) featuring Klingons during its run, not counting the movies, and the very first thing we see in this "new" version is a Klingon mumbling about honor and Sto'vo'kor.
Ok...still didn't feel like the same, and I thought it could have done a whole more. I think it has dared to touch on some themes but then shrunk back. Trek could do more than just nostalgia but it fears to do so because it gets bitten back so hard. Things like LD and fan films get praised for Gene's Vision adherence. Is there any great surprise on falling back on familiar tones?
For the record, I love the Klingons in Discovery and it felt way better than Gowon's remakrs around honor.
Here's my view, naive possibly, but trying optimistic. DSC may be a place to show people both sides, both the fan wank (inevitable) and possibility (Spore Drive). Fans who are newer to the franchise may be able to step in when the older generations dwindle away.It just comes to the point where the franchise is just living on its past glories and making no real attempt to push boundaries or make itself relevant in the here and now. The Spore Drive is a perfect example. You could go anywhere, anytime, any universe and it is simply a gateway to more fanwank.
I know it sells and is a smart business decision on CBS' part to milk the franchise for all that its worth. But that seems to be all it is. There seems to be little or no growth. The only reason Lower Decks works is because it is poking fun at these things that fans take so, so seriously with entertaining characters.
What's left for Trek when the older generations pass on and the pie of viable viewers continues to shrink because they simply have better and more creative options in viewing?
DSC may be a place to show people both sides, both the fan wank (inevitable) and possibility (Spore Drive).
I'll enjoy what's coming out.
It did. But, it's still there with possibility.I think that is the big problem, they never really gave us the possibility of the Spore Drive. It primarily served as the transporter to move us from fanwank to fanwank.
Life is too short to hate.I would never suggest otherwise. People should enjoy what they enjoy. Though I do thank you for an interesting conversation that didn't have "hater" sprinkled throughout because someone disagreed with you.![]()
Yes and no. It can have the effect of basically saying that Trek is only for the fans, and create a very small universe syndrome.If a good enough script is written, doe sit matter if the subject of the script also fulfill a desire from fans to see a particular again?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.