. . . a modern version of Africa, the best song ever . . . /QUOTE]
Debatable!!
The above comment is almost offensive as Peters himself! lol
. . . a modern version of Africa, the best song ever . . . /QUOTE]
Actually, it's a common trope in science fiction that shield strength is proportional to the kinetic energy of the object that strikes them. This goes all the way back to Dune, but you also see it in Star Wars and a host of other shows and books. Under this trope, particles coming at the ship at beyond light speed would definitely trigger the shields, while a very slow but very massive ship could slide through the shields and break through a weak point in a ships hull. The real question is whether or not it violates existing Star Trek canon with regards to how shields work, which it might. I'll leave that up to you to debate.And then there's the fact that the D7 shields are photon torpedo proof and phasor proof, but somehow another Federation ship going at slow impulse speeds can penetrate them and sever the boom of a D7.
My point? If the shields can deflect matter and energy propelled at near light speeds; why wouldn't a starship hull just bounce off them as well?
It's bad strategy from a command standpoint, but it's perfectly in keeping with the psychology of a race that values fighting itself over life and territory. I'm not sure Joe Viewer actually cares that much about the logic of a military strategy anyways. However, it is rather hypocritical to put in a nonsensical big battle if you're representing your movie as being smarter Trek than CBS...Also I love how after 4 years of grabbing territory that somehow the Klingon Admiralty feels it's their best bet to send every single ship in their fleet to one location. Yes let's take all that territory and then leave it undefended And even though we're decisively winning the war, risk every gain on an attempt to destroy a few star fleet ships.
Africa, the best song ever
Taste in music is never debatable!!!Debatable!!
Yep, SG-1 did the same thing with Goa'uld personal shields, which allowed O'Neill to demonstrate his knife-throwing abilities.Actually, it's a common trope in science fiction that shield strength is proportional to the kinetic energy of the object that strikes them. This goes all the way back to Dune, but you also see it in Star Wars and a host of other shows and books. Under this trope, particles coming at the ship at beyond light speed would definitely trigger the shields, while a very slow but very massive ship could slide through the shields and break through a weak point in a ships hull. The real question is whether or not it violates existing Star Trek canon with regards to how shields work, which it might. I'll leave that up to you to debate.
This is probably the biggest sticking point for me with regards to the actual film. The BTS stuff just makes it that much worse.However, it is rather hypocritical to put in a nonsensical big battle if you're representing your movie as being smarter Trek than CBS...
Has anybody here read the Garth of Izar novel? I was curious how it's characterization of Garth compares to what Peters and Co. have put together.
I just looked it up and apparently it takes place after Whom Gods Destroy, but I would assume it must get into his history at least a little.
"This is the fourth in a series of Kickstarters featuring the ships of Axanar, the most famous Star Trek fan film of all time."
Beat me to it.Infamous.
I don't care. They were both worth it.Of course, it's hard to be a favorite anything if it doesn't even exist.
EDIT: I have no idea how that became two separate postings.
Just be happy all's quite on the Axanar front for a change and not sucking up all the attention related to things fanfilm.No updates since Nov 18?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.