I still feel that the Pakleds could do with some redeeming.
They had some interesting parts in Seven Deadly Sins and Fortunes of War.
I still feel that the Pakleds could do with some redeeming.
It's there for those who appreciate it. Those who don't can just zoom on by….
Collateral Damage was not the end of the Novelverse, we've at least two more left, Voyager: To Lose the Earth, and a David Mack novel featuring Data and Lal.
Turns out I might have been mistaken and the Data and Lal book might not be a definite thing. But, if it is I'm pretty sure it'll probably be a TNG book.I was thinking of it as the end for the TNG section. Voyager is fine but I admit I didn't keep up with it nearly as well as I did the other novel lines. Also, it seemed to primarily wrap up the "main" storylines of the novelverse with their Presidential overthrows, Borg invasion, and Section 31 aftermaths.
I'm sure the final Voyager novel will be great but I don't think it'll deal with so many preexisting plots the way Collateral Damage did.
I'm only up to Chapter 3, and the shifts in perspective and tense when we change narrators is already kind of getting on my nerves. I don't mind so much going from first to third person with the different characters, but adding the shift from past tense to present tense on top of that is really bugging me.
It was, admittedly, a literary style experiment, one inspired by the work of my acquaintance Seth Dickinson. I can understand if it doesn't work for every reader. I thought it was interesting and worth trying. I'm just glad my editors were willing to give me the freedom to try something like this.I didn't bother me once I realized it signified the way the narrating character does not think of himself as having a future and doesn't let himself think of the past; he lives in an eternal middle, his life rudderless and desperate, so narrating his life in present tense makes sense from a character POV.
Sorry, you've lost me. I've never played MGS — can you explain this reference to me?I found it fun. It’s not every day you get a metal gear solid pastiche in a Star Trek novel.
Sorry, you've lost me. I've never played MGS — can you explain this reference to me?
Ah. It's a pretty old trope: the "man in the van," or Q working with Bond, etc. Tech support and field agent. I didn't think of it as any kind of series-specific homage.Naomi Wildman bares comparisons to Mei Ling, amongst other bits that I don’t recall too exactly. Some bits were more Bond than Snake, but I also remember feeling some similarities to Guns of the Patriots. I felt it was in keeping with your earlier Terminator gags in other books.
Ah. It's a pretty old trope: the "man in the van," or Q working with Bond, etc. Tech support and field agent. I didn't think of it as any kind of series-specific homage.
Oh I definitely got the bond thing too. If you ever see/play MGS you will see it and probably laugh. Admittedly, Kojima went to the Bond well, and Mei Ling is in some ways an updated always-on moneypenny.
I didn't get a Bond vibe at all. Okuna is the exact opposite of Bond in a lot of ways -- he's not coded as English, he's constantly getting his ass kicked, there's no sense of glamor, he's not hanging out at classy exotic locales, there's no coded nostalgia for colonialism, and the one woman he hits on rejects him until he apologizes for not respecting her feelings.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.