FanFilmFactor has a blog post on latest Ares Studio kickstarter:
https://fanfilmfactor.com/2020/06/2...ilable-in-a-new-kickstarter-for-ares-studios/
They exceeded their goal in half a day.
FanFilmFactor has a blog post on latest Ares Studio kickstarter:
https://fanfilmfactor.com/2020/06/2...ilable-in-a-new-kickstarter-for-ares-studios/
They exceeded their goal in half a day.
FanFilmFactor has a blog post on latest Ares Studio kickstarter:
https://fanfilmfactor.com/2020/06/2...ilable-in-a-new-kickstarter-for-ares-studios/
They exceeded their goal in half a day.
Every single example he cited uses "Star Fleet" -- two words -- whereas these use "Starfleet" -- one word -- which IS trademarked. I mentioned before how my friend had to name his game "Star Fleet Battle" as a license requirement from the IP holders.And although they do say “Starfleet,” that word (or words) have way too common usage in commercial ventures—for example, here, here, here, here, here, and here—to qualify for copyright or trademark protection.
For the original dates, it looked like they were going for Kelvin Timeline style Stardates that used the year, isn't 2244 when Axanar takes place?Also looks like the "Laid Down" and "Launched" dates were changed for some odd reason. That second poster really seems wonky to me, on multiple levels.
In an age where some idiot wants to cancel Paw Patrol because one puppy is dressed like a cop, senses of humor are no longer allowed.
They probably got stardates and “normal” year dates mixed up.For the original dates, it looked like they were going for Kelvin Timeline style Stardates that used the year, isn't 2244 when Axanar takes place?
Also a lot more text was changed other than that. It's now a 'Tactical Assault Cruiser' instead of a 'Federation Assault Cruiser', 'General Deck Plans' instead of "Deck Plans"
The entire box above that was re-written.
Yeah I saw that too. Astonishing. I guess everyone wants to have their name as an Admiral these days.
Then again, I found the differences between the two versions of the named blueprint sheet quite interesting, especially in light of the incentive to be labeled as an "Admiral" on them. For reference:
Before (first email, when the incentive was to have donor names listed as "Admirals"):
View attachment 16328
After (latest email, announcing success, where the donor Admirals appear to have gotten a demotion to Commander (Cmdr.), some people's names got dropped and new ones added and Alex's "contribution" got changed from "Design Bureau" to "Spaceframe"):
View attachment 16329
Also looks like the "Laid Down" and "Launched" dates were changed for some odd reason. That second poster really seems wonky to me, on multiple levels.
Why do they spend so much time on ancillary projects when the main project is moving at a snail's pace?
Very cart before the horse.It's entirely by design. If/when LFIM (Alec) actually completes the project, he'll have no reason to continue his BS fundraising and thus, his source of income will dry up.
You know, when I re-did the deck plans I created (to make the ship 20% bigger), it took me a solid month to draft eight decks. And I had a previous set to borrow heavily from. I never kept track, but I have easily logged a couple thousand hours to draw them. If someone can do eight decks in a week, either they do something like it for their real job, are very very good, or didn't put a lot of thought into it. But I'm just an amateur, so who am I to say?Alexander used Adobe Illustrator to create the blueprints, spending an average of 5-10 hours per deck and then another 3 hours laying them out on the individual pages (plus extra time making alterations along the way).
Free money to pay his bill.Why do they spend so much time on ancillary projects when the main project is moving at a snail's pace?
Also, when people claim he hasn't made anything he can point to these small things as proof.It's entirely by design. If/when LFIM (Alec) actually completes the project, he'll have no reason to continue his BS fundraising and thus, his source of income will dry up.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.