They existed in the gray regions of legality. Their very name comes from Section 31 of the Articles of the Federation (or maybe it was the Starfleet Charter, can’t remember exactly). Because of that, they were never illegitimate, nor 100% illegal, despite how distasteful their actions may be perceived.
It would have been trivial to explain the DIS Klingon ships being the original ships stolen from the alien conquers of the Klingons. That would make them the finest, or most honorable, ships of the great houses given their history and almost mythical significance. Only lesser houses, corsairs, pirates, and civilians would use new builds. Then have most of those ancient ships destroyed through the war, which makes the new build imperial cruiser more acceptable.
^^^ Interesting notion, but the canonical origins of Section 31 were already established on-screen (books have never been considered a part of official canon in any capacity, that I'm aware of). @DEWLine helpfully provided the exact wording here: "Article 14, Section 31 of the United Earth Starfleet charter", as mentioned in the DS9 episode "Inquisition". Memory Alpha's reference to it is here (paragraph 3).
I have no problem with that, especially given the kind of technology Trek has, and I would expect them to be rebuilding the ships as needed. It would be a ship of Theseus thing going on.That would have made those ships 900 years old. I don’t find that very realistic.
Originally that's what I wanted the explanation to be, along with the new Klingons being the human equivalent to Neanderthals, or vice versa, also rendering them immune to the Augment derived humanizing disease the other Klingons would be suffering. But when it turned out every house ship has the same aesthetic of a type we never saw before, and every house has the same style of Klingon, it throws that idea out the window.Or, maybe the Klingons are an entire species with billions of people and hundreds of national cultures, and they simply have multiple design lineages. I mean, hell, just compare the Apollo spacecraft to the Soyuz -- or heck, even within the United States, there's a clear design lineage from Apollo to Crew Dragon that isn't shared with the Space Shuttle design. Or just compare, say, a B-52 to a Boeing 777. Multiple design lineages are perfectly plausible.
Precisely so. One doesn't need to like the new Klingon ships aesthetically to appreciate the expansion of cultural design.Or, maybe the Klingons are an entire species with billions of people and hundreds of national cultures, and they simply have multiple design lineages. I mean, hell, just compare the Apollo spacecraft to the Soyuz -- or heck, even within the United States, there's a clear design lineage from Apollo to Crew Dragon that isn't shared with the Space Shuttle design. Or just compare, say, a B-52 to a Boeing 777. Multiple design lineages are perfectly plausible.
*looks at Star Charts' Klingon maps again*Precisely so. One doesn't need to like the new Klingon ships aesthetically to appreciate the expansion of cultural design.
Personal head canon is that the older ships and designs were far more expensive. L'Rell;s use of the D7 desgin was designed to be more practical and less resource intensive, due to the Klingons having more resource poor worlds.
So I guess you didn't like the big battles in DS9 either?I have no particular complaint about the design of the ships in PIC, but what bugs me was that there were too damn many of them in the finale.
In ST, a single starship should be a major character that has a name, history, meaning, gravitas. When there are hundreds of them, they become nothing but a mass of mooks. Specks on the screen.
Each side should have had no more than four ships. Four big, dangerous ships with serious mass and presence.
Well I accept that they were major battles, where the fate of the whole Federation and Alpha Quadrant was at stake. Still I'd have preferred them too to be a bit smaller in numbers.So I guess you didn't like the big battles in DS9 either?
That's how I see it. I expect PIC Starfleet is a bit more like TOS starfleet, unabashedly a military force along with its other roles.I would like to think that each battle indicated the need for Starfleet to ramp up.
Well, there is two things that might impact that. One, the Romulan ships may be Tal Shiar vessels and not Romulan government vessels. If that's the case then they might have been building those elsewhere, possibly as part of the recovery effort from the losses when they tried to nuke the Founders homeworld. With all the government upheaval the Tal Shiar may simply not have trusted the Romulan government with those vessels.The only issue both fleets having 200 ships means the Romulans should have been capable of building and crewing fleets on their own to rescue the remaining 900 million, unless that's somehow the whole fleet. It also means Starfleet should have had enough spare crews to continue their, presumably, low level aid. That fleet came together faster than the Wolf 359 fleet, and is over 5 times larger.
Well, there is two things that might impact that. One, the Romulan ships may be Tal Shiar vessels and not Romulan government vessels. If that's the case then they might have been building those elsewhere, possibly as part of the recovery effort from the losses when they tried to nuke the Founders homeworld. With all the government upheaval the Tal Shiar may simply not have trusted the Romulan government with those vessels.
On the Starfleet side we don't know the compliment of those ships and how long it took to assemble them all together. I imagine that those type's of vessels were designed in the wake of Utopia Planitia as being something simple, modular and able to be quickly built. But, that doesn't mean they were available before then.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.