I wonder if there could also be a USS Enquiry.Back to ship design...and ship names. I went looking for other ships named "Inquiry" on marinetraffic.com and Wikipedia and other search engines. Nothing so far. I'd have thought it a natural for a research vessel.
There was nothing in DS9 that would be against them being legit in the past.
The events in S2 is probably what made them go under ground and become what they were in DS9.
They existed in the gray regions of legality. Their very name comes from Section 31 of the Articles of the Federation (or maybe it was the Starfleet Charter, can’t remember exactly). Because of that, they were never illegitimate, nor 100% illegal, despite how distasteful their actions may be perceived.
Yup. Although we have three distinct eras where S31 is seen operating. In ENT, it's a shady cabal that doesn't officially exist. In DSC and the parallel Into Darkness, it's a little-known but quite legitimate branch of Starfleet. And in DS9, it's back to shady cabal.
Supposedly, the S31 show would describe the DSC era (or Kelvin universe era, or TOS era, or whatever you want to call it), and there S31 would have little need to hide from Starfleet.
It might of course still engage in wholly illegal operations, like CIA and MI6 frequently do (all the more frequently in fiction, of course, and this is fiction!), and try and avoid drawing undue attention to those; half the plots could be about these Starfleet Intelligence workers trying to hide their work from their superiors or colleagues.
Back to ship design...and ship names. I went looking for other ships named "Inquiry" on marinetraffic.com and Wikipedia and other search engines. Nothing so far. I'd have thought it a natural for a research vessel.
I wonder if there could also be a USS Enquiry.
Technically Sloan says the original Starfleet charter, not the Earth Starfleet Charter.When Sloan cites A14S31 of the UESF Charter as the source of Section 31's legal authority to exist, his legal argument false for two reasons:
Technically Sloan says the original Starfleet charter, not the Earth Starfleet Charter.Sci said:When Sloan cites A14S31 of the UESF Charter as the source of Section 31's legal authority to exist, his legal argument false for two reasons:
pre-Fed Section 31 could have had that part of the Earth Starfleet charter grandfathered into the original Federation Starfleet charter.
Because the Federation wasn't a "thing" until Gene Coon introduced the idea later in to the first Season of TOS. According to my quick research it was "A Taste of Armageddon." Until that point, you are right it was all "Earth." Balance of Terror had "Earth Outposts" and Tomorrow is Yesterday had the "United Earth Space Probe Agency" and Kirk calling it a "combined service" when asked by an Air Force pilot.Also, in TOS Starfleet seemed to also be more an Earth thing rather than Federation thing, at least early on.
What would a DSC Style TOS Klingon BoP even look like?There is a fair chance that we could see Romulan BoP's in SNW at some point.
Hoping we will see proper Klingon BoP's as well alongside the D7.
It would be "proper" whatever that meansWhat would a DSC Style TOS Klingon BoP even look like?
What would a DSC Style TOS Klingon BoP even look like?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.