I had a long reply, but why have a long post when can you have a short one? And it's this: There's a time and place for everything, and I'm secure enough in being 40 that I don't mind watching a scene like this every now and then. Sometimes you just have to let loose.While it is nice to see Riker back it felt cliche to have him say "im in the best most super duper cool ship so ha!". Is that really the best they could come up with? Is it a line that would appeal to an adult audience or a child audience?
Well, here's hoping it doesn't become like the Excelsior Class. "We need a ship! Hey! Let's use the USS Tadpoal!"
It’s even worse with the Excelsior. They filmed it a total of two times, in the first episode of TNG season 1 and the first episode of season 2, and then proceeded to use that stock footage for the rest of the series.
I like that PIC used a ship that actually looked like it was from Star TrekThe Defiant was originally a prototype for what would have been a copy/paste fleet. I guess that ship design in PIC ultimately took its place?
Am adult-it appealed.While it is nice to see Riker back it felt cliche to have him say "im in the best most super duper cool ship so ha!". Is that really the best they could come up with? Is it a line that would appeal to an adult audience or a child audience?
If only production technology had moved on in 33 years.
The other difference being, the Excelsior class is a beautiful design. The USS Copy Paste is... not. As with most Eaves designs, it might look good from 1 angle maybe, at best. The reason the original 1701 is such a classic is that it looks good from every angle.
Yeah the fleet didn't bother me at all, I was too busy trying to identify Riker's ship.
Would be nice to get more information about the ships shown, its not exactly a necessity though.
Would have been nice to have seen some recognisable classes just for continuity's sake, fair play to them for going to the trouble of making new ones, even if they didn't make it in to the episode in the end.
No doubt we will see plenty of that in SNW.![]()
And I'm reasonably sure that the next Enterprise will be designed by him as well.
Some had different nacelles.There was only one class of ship shown. Multiplied 200 times.
You must have hated the TOS Movie and TNG series eras.the whole thing will be over-designed, loads of surface detail, with angular nacelles with 24 different bumps of various shapes and sizes all over them.
Some had different nacelles.
You must have hated the TOS Movie and TNG series eras.
Different nacelle caps. That doesn't qualify them as a different class.
Actually the caps/Bussard collectors can be different and it still be the same class. Compare the NCC-1701 from "The Cage(TOS)" with the same ship from regular TOS. One had red caps with spikes and the other had translucent Bussard collectors with spinning warp plasma.
Many Eaves ships are the best in the franchise.
It bothers me greatly there are people who grew up on the Enterprise-E that aren't 11.I grew up with the Enterprise-E, so naturally I'm more predisposed to that visual aesthetic than the original Matt Jeffries Enterprise.
Eaves' E and its shuttles, Phoenix, Son'a ships, Valdore, Kelvin shuttles, OV-165, Xindi Aquatic and Insectoid ships, Sarajevo, and Nimitz class look just as good as (and some even better than) Probert's D, its shuttles, the D'deridex, and Sternbach's Voyager, its shuttles, Negh'var, Nova, Prometheus, Wells, and Aeon.I wouldn’t go that far. While Eaves is a professional designer, Andrew Probert, Matt Jeffries, Harold Michelson and Rick Sternbach are far better than him, IMHO.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.