• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Untitled Star Trek - Discovery project

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've heard a rumour that Enterprise 2001 will be re-named either STAR TREK: FAITH OF THE HEART or STAR TREK: WE'RE LIKE GAZELLES OR SOMETHING.
 
I had a thought. Maybe the DSC Untitled Project covers ground that we didn't see in the first two seasons.

1. Captain Killy (biggest missed opportunity!)
2. Prime Lorca
3. How Lorca got command of Discovery
4. What ultimately became of L'Rell's Chancellorship
5. The Adventures of Po! (who should've gone with them)
6. A follow-up to The Kelpians vs. The Ba'ul
7. A prequel on the Shenzhou

I would love BSG:Pegasus style movie about prime Lorca but only if he is as cool as early season DIS Lorca
 
Maybe the DSC Untitled Project covers ground
The “Discovery” in the listing isn’t referring to the show but the production crew.

“Untitled Project Involving Canadian Crew Members From Star Trek Discovery As They Consult On The Next Film And Need To Have Their Work Put On Public File” would have been a better title.

This is the Noah Hawley film.
 
The “Discovery” in the listing isn’t referring to the show but the production crew.

“Untitled Project Involving Canadian Crew Members From Star Trek Discovery As They Consult On The Next Film And Need To Have Their Work Put On Public File” would have been a better title.

This is the Noah Hawley film.
You only share links with moderators. Well, I was a moderator on this board for six years.

If that's not good enough, then send a link to one of the moderators, so I can confirm with them. I have several friends on staff and I've known the board manager for 20 years. We used to be co-mods.

Share your link with someone, even if it's not me, and prove this is legitimate one way or another... Or stop constantly saying this so definitively.

Thank you.
 
You only share links with moderators. Well, I was a moderator on this board for six years.

If that's not good enough, then send a link to one of the moderators, so I can confirm with them. I have several friends on staff and I've known the board manager for 20 years. We used to be co-mods.

Share your link with someone, even if it's not me, and prove this is legitimate one way or another... Or stop constantly saying this so definitively.

Thank you.

He has shown me some proof regarding Starfleet Academy being in active development and probably set in the 32nd century with Discovery on New Earth. So I wouldn't rule his posts out if I were you...
 
He has shown me some proof regarding Starfleet Academy being in active development and probably set in the 32nd century with Discovery on New Earth. So I wouldn't rule his posts out if I were you...
Okay. You're someone who I feel like I can trust at their word.
 
Okay. You're someone who I feel like I can trust at their word.

It's always difficult to believe someone who claims to have inside information, when you don't know that person at all, only through the internet. My profession is being a journalist (local news, nothing big) and I try to find as many sources as possible when someone claims to have inside information, to see if I can find any other source or connection to that source/information that can confirm the likelyhood of these 'scoops'.

Regarding Star Trek: Pike and Starfleet Academy are likely the two not announced TV series. I have seen proof of Academy, not Pike though. But people working on Strange New World are designing the Enterprise Sickbay and such... So 1 + 1 + still 2, if you'd ask me. I haven't seen any proof regarding Discovery, Section 31 and Picard filming multiple seasons back to back. Nor any proof regarding any movie whatsoever. They only thing I'm kind of certain of is Pike and Starfleet Academy.

We'll see. Even things you think are certain can be something else in the end...
 
You only share links with moderators. Well, I was a moderator on this board for six years.

If that's not good enough, then send a link to one of the moderators, so I can confirm with them. I have several friends on staff and I've known the board manager for 20 years. We used to be co-mods.

Share your link with someone, even if it's not me, and prove this is legitimate one way or another... Or stop constantly saying this so definitively.

Thank you.

He has shown me some proof regarding Starfleet Academy being in active development and probably set in the 32nd century with Discovery on New Earth. So I wouldn't rule his posts out if I were you...

See, this is what I find annoying and condescending. Said person posts 'inside info' but when pressed for proof, said person states they'll only share proof with mods. Which is bs, because said person then goes and shows another poster said proof privately. So, what, @Visitor1982 gets the benefit of what only mods get, even though he's no different of a TrekBBS member than I am?

(EDIT: This is not a rant against Visitor1982; this is a rant about hypocrisy.)
 
It's always difficult to believe someone who claims to have inside information, when you don't know that person at all, only through the internet. My profession is being a journalist (local news, nothing big) and I try to find as many sources as possible when someone claims to have inside information, to see if I can find any other source or connection to that source/information that can confirm the likelyhood of these 'scoops'.
See, this is what I find annoying and condescending. Said person posts 'inside info' but when pressed for proof, said person states they'll only share proof with mods. Which is bs, because said person then goes and shows another poster said proof privately. So, what, @Visitor1982 gets the benefit of what only mods get, even though he's no different of a TrekBBS member than I am?

(EDIT: This is not a rant against Visitor1982; this is a rant about hypocrisy.)
Personally, if I state something as fact, I don't do it unless I'm willing to provide proof. If I can't prove that what I'm saying is a fact, I won't say it. When I'm posting something, I do it in such a way so that I provide a source so it's possible for someone to come to the same conclusion I did.

If I'm not willing to provide that proof, I won't post information about it at all. It strikes me as a half-measure. Because if you say something and don't back it up, then people have to take you at your word. And if you want people to take you at your word, they have to trust you, and that's not going to happen unless you build a rapport and use some tact. It can be done. Hoity Toity did it last year. Xavi hasn't.

Aside from that, this is 2020. If something is online, a Google Search should yield a search result to find what I'm looking for. So saying "I have info! But I'm not going to share it except to people who I deem worthy!" strikes me as pulling a power play. "I have info and you don't!" That rubs me the wrong way. And I'm willing to bet it rubs a lot of other people the wrong way too. Those are the things I have an issue with.

And if it's something super-duper top secret, then he shouldn't be sharing it in the first place or even sharing behind closed-doors, if security is that much of an issue. A leak is a leak, no matter how it's done. But I don't think this is that. So it's weird.

The information isn't the problem. It's the way he's going about it.

When I did a Google Search, this was the only link I saw for an Untitled Star Trek: Discovery Project. And Visitor1982 says it's a Pike project. That's what I'll go with and all I'll go with, until we all find out more.
 
Last edited:
^
No, no... That Untitled Star Trek Discovery project is not a Pike thing. Strange New World (season 1) on that Canadian website is. I don't know what the untitled Discovery project is. Captain Xavi claims it's actually a Star Trek movie for Paramount, but I haven't seen any proof of that. Just Starfleet Academy and just some deducting skills and common sense regarding the Pike show Strange New World (working title).
 
Just because somebody has privately showed someone else something they claim is proof of vague statements they have made publicly does not automatically gain them credibility, at least in my mind, because there is no way to verify the veracity of what they're providing as proof.
 
Just because somebody has privately showed someone else something they claim is proof of vague statements they have made publicly does not automatically gain them credibility, at least in my mind, because there is no way to verify the veracity of what they're providing as proof.

Suit yourself. It's not up to me to decide what you do believe or don't. The only thing I can say is that I have seen unmistakable proof that a show called Starfleet Academy is in 'active production' and that it is set on New Earth and called a Discovery spin-off. My guess New Earth is what season 3 of Discovery is about (building a new Federation and home planet, so Starfleet Academy will be set in the 32rd century), but that last sentence is just conjecture on my part. We'll see.
 
The only thing I can say is that I have seen unmistakable proof that a show called Starfleet Academy is in 'active production' and that it is set on New Earth and called a Discovery spin-off.

Then show us the proof, since you’re not under any obligation to keep quiet about it.
 
Then show us the proof, since you’re not under any obligation to keep quiet about it.

I was asked not to. And even if I wanted to, which I don't, Captain Xavi deleted the document he send to me through PM. What I read was official, no doubt about it.
 
There’s a reason why the press don’t reveal inside sources, so they don’t get in trouble.

@Visitor1982 is not a member of the press, as far as I know.

I was asked not to. And even if I wanted to, which I don't, Captain Xavi deleted the document he send to me through PM. What I read was official, no doubt about it.

I might not have been clear in my previous post. I didn't mean to imply that I wanted to know what your or Xavi's sources were; I just wanted to know what the information that you were given was. As you mentioned before, it's not your problem whether I believe you or not, which wasn't even my point. If someone is going to blab that that they've seen something, IMHO at least they should have the courtesy of sharing that info instead of being all coy about it like that other guy was.
 
@Visitor1982 is not a member of the press, as far as I know.



I might not have been clear in my previous post. I didn't mean to imply that I wanted to know what your or Xavi's sources were; I just wanted to know what the information that you were given was. As you mentioned before, it's not your problem whether I believe you or not, which wasn't even my point. If someone is going to blab that that they've seen something, IMHO at least they should have the courtesy of sharing that info instead of being all coy about it like that other guy was.

I'm a journalist.

I have shared the info before, but I'm willing to share it again:

The information I got was an official production document for Star Trek - Starfleet Academy. It is described as a Discovery spin-off set on New Earth, which probably means it is set in the 32nd century, as season 3 of Discovery is (I wouldn't be surprised if Section 31 is set in the same century as well). The document from earlier this year says the show is in active development, not pre-production (yet). It includes several names and addresses (work related) from different producers on this show. It was a legitimate document.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top