• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers On Seven and sexuality

Forced politics is part of Trek.

I remember TPTB giving T'Pol a terminal disease as part of UPN's AIDS Awareness campaign. :shifty:

Whatever I declared it to be.

Pythagoras had a saying along those lines.


As did Lewis Carroll:

"When I use a word," Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, "it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less." -- Through the Looking Glass
 
I can't find the EDIT button, so double post. AlanC9, I think Kpnuts is trying to say that people who differ from heterosexual are in the minority. Take myself for example. I am 36. I've met a few gay people over the years, and one transsexual. As for people I call friend, one is gay, two are bisexual in a homosexual relationship. That's all. If modern TV wants to acknowledge that people are openly gay or whatever, producers & writers discretion. However, when lots of TV shows have LGBT or whatever acronym characters, and you're seeing it more on TV than in real life, it becomes unrealistic.
Many people could easily and truthfully claim the exact opposite experience: that LGBT people are commonplace in their social orbit and everyday lives, and that seeing increased representation on television is bringing a sense of realism to what they watch. Whether something aligns with your specific experience or not is not necessarily an accurate barometer for realism.

Discovery: I've only seen the first season, but there were only two gay characters, the doctor and engineer, right?
Picard: Holding hands doesn't make people gay, it doesn't even mean a relationship. It can just mean those two people are very close. Let's see what happens in Season 2.
In Discovery, not counting Mirror Universe characters, there are three confirmed LGBT characters: Stamets, Culber and Reno. On Picard, we have two characters who are implied to be sexually fluid to some degree, which has now been confirmed multiple times by Michael Chabon -- so at this point, there really isn't any debate on how to interpret those Seven scenes. It's fine that people didn't pick up on it, but it's also been made pretty clear by Chabon that those who did were correct in their interpretation. Chabon may no longer be showrunner, but will remain involved as an executive producer, has written two episodes for season two, and given that he has said the Seven/Raffi relationship will be explored in season two, there isn't any reason not to believe him.

With that out of the way: it really isn't unrealistic or farfetched at all for there to be a mere five canonically gay/bi characters out of the hundreds of characters we've seen thus far across the Trek franchise. If it were up to many of the actors and writers involved with the Berman-era Trek series, we would have seen many more LGBT characters on these shows a lot sooner than we did, and that still wouldn't have been an unrealistic amount. The galaxy is massive and filled with countless lifeforms -- they certainly aren't all going to be cishet. Honestly, it's more unrealistic that the 24th Century had for so long been depicted as beholden to retrograde 20th Century ideas about gender and sexuality.

Frankly, the need so many people seem to have to try to calculate the "correct" percentage of LGBT characters for any given piece of media is dehumanizing and betrays a fundamental lack of understanding of how aggressively and pervasively LGBT people have been erased from or minimized in historical narratives as well as mainstream film and television, which of course spreads the perception that we barely exist, and that's by design. Further, a lot of these conversations about "realism" in television vis a vis minority representation tend to be disingenuous, anyway: a lot of people only seem to care about shows conforming to standards of realism when they're confronted with content they'd rather not see.

Regarding Seven's apparent lack of interest in women on VOY: setting aside the fact that The Powers That Be never would have allowed otherwise, Seven was at the mercy of her crewmates and their decisions in how to best teach her about the basics of life, including romance and dating. As others have already pointed out, she didn't really have the full opportunity to explore her identity until after she arrived on Earth and could learn that there's a lot more to life and to being human than what she had been exposed to on that ship. Beyond that, sexuality is complex; there isn't any one "correct" way to grow into our sexual identities, it's different for everyone. A lot can happen to a person in just a few years, let alone the two decades Seven has spent living before we caught up with her in Picard. Additionally, there are plenty of aspects of ourselves that not everyone sees, but they are still important facets of our identities. They don't cease to exist when they aren't being perceived by outside observers. Just because we as viewers weren't privy to any sort of grand "coming out" moment for Seven doesn't necessarily mean it never happened, and just because she didn't have a same-sex relationship in Voyager doesn't mean she can't be attracted to women as well as men (or anyone else across the gender spectrum). For many people, sexuality is fluid and cannot be compartmentalized in either a "straight" or "gay" box. Diversity of sexual identity is a recurring theme of science fiction, albeit much more in literature than mainstream TV, but it nevertheless seems fitting that a show like Picard would explore it in some fashion.
 
I am appalled by the producers framing Raffi - a former addict - doing shots with somebody as a "positive" ending. Them holding hands just came out of nowhere, so it doesn't save the scene.

Seven definitely is not gay, but there's nothing in the way of her being bi-sexual. (Raffi I assumed mostly straight, too, because she had a son, but who knows, maybe she had him with another woman? It's the future).

Seven & another women certainly should not be more extraordinary than Seven & a hologram, a thing which was also played with in VOY. They never did that on VOY - but Seven never seemed totally opposed either - she seems very open-minded.

Can't speak for others, but I have two obvious problems:
  1. The alcohol thing
  2. The off-screen, post-happy-ending break-up with Chakotay just to have your sexy main star be single again

Is it alcohol, or synthohol, and 30 years later, what is the fucking difference?
 
Chakotay may have the charisma of a plank of wood. But that of a very attractive plank of wood.
Oh yeeahhh... :adore:

Lots of people come out as gay or trans later in life for various reasons.
Absolutely, I was about to post that same thought. And with Seven's character, what we know about her up to this point, plus her age, etc. I can find it more plausible and believable. On a personal level, even relatable.
 
Seven lives in a universe where some species have one gendar and some species have four gendars, so who she romances as long as they are sentient beings would be irrelevant to her. This is a universe where a humanoid can mate with a felinoid.
 
I think it's a mistake to make Raffi and Seven lovers or in a relationship. To me they make better friends with a shared pass. Both have a drug issue one with that smoking substance and then Seven's drinking problem. Both have lost a child. Raffi son wants nothing to do with her and Icheb is dead. They both have even seem to have been discarded by Starfleet. Raffi got fired and for some reason Seven isn't close with her Voyager family. To me a romance between them feels ordinary and even predicable and frankly it would be more interesting to make them form a sisterly kind of bond.

The main reason and I brought this up is the show has other concerns besides their love life and I was thinking of who would be perfect to explore a relationship with Seven and that is the Borg Queen who has been disconnected from the collective. The show needs to bring some purpose for using the Borg again and Seven and the Queen to me felt like they had a special kind of bond as well. It would also be fun seeing the queen having to be a normal person again. It brings Picard into the story since he also has a history with the queen and she was fascinated by Data so she also seems interested in synch life. Also Guinan is going to be in next season so I am expecting something heavy with the Borg in season 2.

Raffi's main arc next season should not be romance but trying to connect with her son and frankly becoming a whole person again. Friendship with Seven and renewed one with Picard. Maybe her and Rios are recruited by Starfleet so they are thinking about rejoining. I assume they will only have 10 episodes so they need to really make room to fill everything in and romance in general should only be used if it ties strongly into the main plot like a Seven and Borg Queen one would do. Only way Seven and Raffi works is if Raffi leaves to be Fenis Ranger which also wouldn't be a bad idea but then that still leaves the use of the Borg this past season as being pointless. Hugh's death having no meaning to boot.

Jason
 
The main reason and I brought this up is the show has other concerns besides their love life and I was thinking of who would be perfect to explore a relationship with Seven and that is the Borg Queen who has been disconnected from the collective. The show needs to bring some purpose for using the Borg again and Seven and the Queen to me felt like they had a special kind of bond as well.

Seven may not want anything to do with the Borg Queen again. She left the cube for a reason (had she stayed there much longer, she risked going back into a very dark place).

She left the cube for the sake of her sanity.
 
I can't find the EDIT button, so double post. AlanC9, I think Kpnuts is trying to say that people who differ from heterosexual are in the minority. Take myself for example. I am 36. I've met a few gay people over the years, and one transsexual. As for people I call friend, one is gay, two are bisexual in a homosexual relationship. That's all. If modern TV wants to acknowledge that people are openly gay or whatever, producers & writers discretion. However, when lots of TV shows have LGBT or whatever acronym characters, and you're seeing it more on TV than in real life, it becomes unrealistic.

Discovery: I've only seen the first season, but there were only two gay characters, the doctor and engineer, right?
Picard: Holding hands doesn't make people gay, it doesn't even mean a relationship. It can just mean those two people are very close. Let's see what happens in Season 2.

On hand holding, my gay friend deals with ongoing depression and anxiety. There are times where I've held his hand to ground him, to help him calm down. Does that mean people think we're gay? I don't care. Does that mean we're in a relationship? No. It means I'm his friend. People read waaaaay too much into hand holding. It can mean so many different things without context. In the case of Seven and Raffi, it could just mean they're close friends who've both suffered a lot of loss, they're bonding. Again, how about we wait for Season 2 to see what happens?
You’re thinking way too much about gay people on television. They don’t have to actually obey population statistics for a show, that’s absurd. They tell stories they want to tell and we’re seeing a lot more stories that aren’t just about straight and cis people. Meaning that there are going to be some gay and trans characters, this means more nerd shit to obsess over.

I wasn't sure about my sexuality until I was around 25. Things like that need time, especially if you're bi, believe me, it's confusing
I’m in my 30s and trans, my sexuality has drifted around like the island from Lost.
I would love them to represent reality. 5 gay characters in two small-ish crews, with a 6th on the way isn't reality.

I'm not one of these gay men who cheer and clap when I see "one of me" on the screen. I did when they made Sulu gay and potentially when I read Culber was, but then they took it too far, not just gay characters but all sorts of social politics. Now I just find it cringeworthy and forced.
What percentage of gay people in token appearances and only on paper do you consider enough? Can you make it into a math formula so we can calculate the precise number of gay people to add?

Because 5 out of ??? Trek crew members in the entire run of the franchise is clearly just too many gay people.

I’m not sure how you being gay has anything to do with this. This isn’t a rpg, playing the “gay card” doesn’t boost your stats.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top