Heh ... Since the NAME is pretty much what counts, your argument is really rather silly.
Don't get all caught up in swimming across that river in Egypt, the water there leaves a lasting stain when you finally climb out.
Star Trek Picard is not Star Trek
- Thread starter AnotherGalaxys
- Start date
Don't get all caught up in swimming across that river in Egypt, the water there leaves a lasting stain when you finally climb out.
Padmé isn't mentioned in any of the Sequel Trilogy movies, either. Just saying.
True. That’s the argument I use when people say that the Star Wars Christmas Special isn’t canon. It’s got Star Wars in the name. Bea Arthur is a Star Wars character and was helping Wookiees celebrate life day. You can’t deny it happened. It’s true. All of it.Heh ... Since the NAME is pretty much what counts, your argument is really rather silly.
Don't get all caught up in swimming across that river in Egypt, the water there leaves a lasting stain when you finally climb out.
I saw him twice at Union College in Schenectady, NY during that time period.
The first time I got his autograph and spent about 10 minutes talking to him one-on-one.
(there were only seven of us who attended)
He was a very interesting and intelligent man to talk to back then.
Heh ... and Life Day has been mentioned several times in Star Wars Productions since then, so yeah it is true.
BTW: I'm not the one in denial.
By 1981 - he wasn't even sticking around to say anything. there were about 25 or so people in attendance at the show I went to; and we were expecting either an intro by GR or something, but were told: "He dropped off the reels and was going to come back after they were shown...", and I guess that's what happened as I didn't hang around after they started breaking down the projector setup.I saw him twice at Union College in Schenectady, NY during that time period.
The first time I got his autograph and spent about 10 minutes talking to him one-on-one.
(there were only seven of us who attended)
He was a very interesting and intelligent man to talk to back then.
Except JJ Abrams went out of his way to explain why we weren’t getting midichlorians. He didn’t say anything about Padme not being mentioned and no one cared because her existence wasn’t a point of contention with a vast majority of fans. Midichlorians were.
The second time I went was kinda-sorta like that.
There was a much larger crowd, but he did stick around to answer questions for about an hour after the reels were shown.
They weren't decanonized any more than Sybok has been just because he hasn't been mentioned in years. You have every right to think the Prequel Trilogy is garbage but it's no less Star Wars than the Original Trilogy.
For what it's worth, I've mentioned Sybok in the novels and nobody at CBS has ever objected.
Anyway ... this isn't where a "Star Wars" conversation belongs.
SO, you can continue on your own as that ideologue.
GREG COX IS NOT REAL STAR TREK!!!!
Don’t tell me, tell Marvel. They retconned out Itchy and Lumpy! Why they want to act like everything in the Christmas Special isn’t canon, I don’t know.Heh ... and Life Day has been mentioned several times in Star Wars Productions since then, so yeah it is true.
BTW: I'm not the one in denial.
I'm a paid NBC crony but nobody ever asks for my opinion...
[Virginian] Did you say...'Yankee'? [/Virginian] 
"Robbed by the Asterisks" would be something safely said.Whaddya think of dem dare YANKEES?
They are Star Wars, whether the fans like it or not.
And Lazarus
Similar threads
