Yeah I guess that some words are like a trigger for PTSD-like memoriesAs someone who hard parts of his family wiped out in the Holocaust, I'm glad that Chabon has added new words to the Star Trek vocabulary to describe this logic.
Yeah I guess that some words are like a trigger for PTSD-like memoriesAs someone who hard parts of his family wiped out in the Holocaust, I'm glad that Chabon has added new words to the Star Trek vocabulary to describe this logic.
What the holy motherfucking fuck?To better understand this concept, just think about how neo-nazi movements are made up of people who think Hitler was right.
Take a neo-nazi german and an old european jewish and ask both what they think about Hitler: you will get two entirely different versions of the same man.
Is this non-Roddenberrian sentence about my reference to a dark point in human history or because you didn't get my point? I was just saying that even something you can clearly see as a right or wrong situation where everyone has the same opinion you can find people who are on the opposite side.What the holy motherfucking fuck?
how the fuck are neo-nazis people? and why would their fucking opinion matter. fuck this shit.Is this non-Roddenberrian sentence about my reference to a dark point in human history or because you didn't get my point? I was just saying that even something you can clearly see as a right or wrong situation where everyone has the same opinion you can find people who are on the opposite side.
how the fuck are neo-nazis people? and why would their fucking opinion matter. fuck this shit.
Maquis were NEVER portrayed as Fascists.
Look, I get that you were trying to say "One man's hero is another man's villain" and I'm not dsiagreeing that the Federation can be seen as tyrannical from the Maquis' point of view, but good grief did your post take a really wrong turn.I can understand why you say this, but mine was just an exaple, don't take it THAT seriously...
Examples are meant to be a borderline situation in order to be understood by most people
Look, I get that you were trying to say "One man's hero is another man's villain" and I'm not dsiagreeing that the Federation can be seen as tyrannical from the Maquis' point of view, but good grief did your post take a really wrong turn.
almost every country has this problem at the moment, even those that should know better because they've already been there, done that.I didn't want to hurt anyone feelings I'm sorry... It's the first unequivocable example that came trough my mind.
My country is currently suffering because many right-wing movement are openly fascists and the state not only do nothing to stop them, but sometimes it also encouraged them to keep doing the fascist stuff so yeah, I feel like this problem should not be seen as "we don't have to talk about it"
They exist, unfortunately
Mine is onealmost every country has this problem at the moment, even those that should know better because they've already been there, done that.
how the fuck are neo-nazis people? and why would their fucking opinion matter. fuck this shit.
To better understand this concept, just think about how neo-nazi movements are made up of people who think Hitler was right.
Take a neo-nazi german and an old european jewish and ask both what they think about Hitler: you will get two entirely different versions of the same man.
This cannot be overstated. To dehumanize a person, no matter how abhorrent their beliefs are, is to make justifications for treating them worse and worse.Because they are people. People who believe terrible things, yet they didn't just wake up pre-programmed as Neo Nazi's..it's a sequence of events and ideological beliefs that bring them to that point, just like every other political extremist movement..left and right wing.
Take a cardassian occupationist and a Bajorian and ask them what they think about Gul Dukat then.Godwin's law anyone?
they probably hate him bothTake a cardassian occupationist and a Bajorian and ask them what they think about Gul Dukat then.
Forgive me if I don't find the analogies compelling. One group bends the truth to support their opinion. The other is bludgeoned to death by that opinion.Take a cardassian occupationist and a Bajorian and ask them what they think about Gul Dukat then.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.