• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Picard: "Just Like Other Sci-Fi"

I believe that we have to look beyond how culture changes affect Star Trek. Since TNG went off the air, American society itself has had more honest, less idealistic conversations about any number of subjects. We are now having conversations about the ramifications of actions around the world and dealing with the broad dislocations that they cause. They involve violence of the most vile variety, whether in Syria or Central America. Star Trek was always meant to be relevant even before it was meant to represent a better future.
Alas Political agenda's always end up muddying the water to such an extent that no one can see anything anymore.
 
Perhaps I'm just being an apologist now, but pulling some questionable, but less blatant, examples out of hundreds of episodes is a bit more forgiving than having three questionable murders in 2 out of 5 episodes of a series so far. I hope the arch of Picard is to go dark and come out of it with everyone improving and getting better. Hard to say at this point if this is the norm or an inflection point.
The point I'm trying to make is simple: what you know about Star Trek should be learned from Star Trek. The fact that there are examples of these types of reprisals are behaviors that need to be addressed, and sometimes can't be done in a simple manner.
 
The point I'm trying to make is simple: what you know about Star Trek should be learned from Star Trek. The fact that there are examples of these types of reprisals are behaviors that need to be addressed, and sometimes can't be done in a simple manner.
The mythology of what Star Trek "IS AND REPRESENTS" rarely ever matches what was actually depicted on the screen.
 
To those who protest against senseless killings, murderous rage, and revenge I ask: Have you watched the show?

Well, I don't protest, but I've watched it and I didn't like the way they handled Seven's revenge. While in case of Jadzia, Khan or Sisko, they reflected a lot about the senselessness of revenge, now they showed it like Picard would be wrong with his opinion about the worth of revenge. I really hope, that this reflection will follow in Seven's next appearence.
 
TOS
The Man Trap
Charlie X
Where No Man Has Gone Before

Count the dead in just the first three episodes.

Deaths in themselves isn't what I take issue with, it's that our main characters are the ones doing the unnecessary murdering. Charlie was an unhinged boy-god who was clearly the bad guy, the example of what not to be. A salt monster...clearly the bad guy. Crew members taken over by a powerful entity are not our heroes.

The equivalent would be Kirk, Spock, or McCoy going out of their way to seek revenge on someone who has wronged them and murdering anyone in their path. A bit worse yet, leading up to this rampage the shows fanfare swells leading us to believe this is supposed to be a noble act. Again... just such an odd direction to take the character. Fine to have her wrong and jaded, odd to have Picard talk her out of revenge only to have her turn around go all in.
 
Last edited:
I think that Seven's behavior isn't about just being edgy, it has a thematic point...it's meant as a contrast to Picard.
Yeah, not everyone has their own Chateau they can retire to, it even has its own winery ensuring that sobriety is kept to an absolute minimum at all times.

Everything in the show is a contrast to Picard from what I have seen.

It begs the question as to what they plan for the end of the season, will it be a race to the bottom or a high note.
 
So, Kirk kicking him while going "I...have had enough of you!" didn't happen? None of that involved emotion around his son David? :shrug:
I'm sure it involved emotion. And it was directly preceded by Kirk trying to save Kruge despite everything he had done, and Kruge responding by trying to kill Kirk. It was pure self defence and it is very disingenuous to try paint it as revenge.
 
I'm sure it involved emotion. And it was directly preceded by Kirk trying to save Kruge despite everything he had done, and Kruge responding by trying to kill Kirk. It was pure self defence and it is very disingenuous to try paint it as revenge.
I think it was complicated but I don't think revenge if off the table. Especially in light of TUC.
Both actions - Kirk's and Jadzia's missions - had its consequences. (And as long these will be shown in Seven's case, too, I'm still ok with it.)
What were Jadzia's consequences? Sisko gave her a dirty look and...?
 
What were Jadzia's consequences? Sisko gave her a dirty look and...?

Even this is more that anything Seven got so far. And don't forget: The Context is King. In Jadzia's case there were enough other scenes where Jadzia also struggled with the idea of the revenge (especially after the revenge). In Seven's case, we have a main char, that didn't struggle with this until now or had any consequences. And this is not the way, the Trek universe did work in former shows. So, like in the case of some similiar acts by Archer, I just want to see something more than a Seven, that now has to be "immoral", just to let Picard shine a bit more.
 
I think it was complicated but I don't think revenge if off the table. Especially in light of TUC.

He literally tells Kruge when he's hanging off the cliff, to "Give me your hand!"

It's only when Kruge then uses that mercy to try and kill him by grabbing his ankle to pull him over the edge, that Kirk finally reaches the limits of mercy/patience.

I'd also point out Kirk's reaction to his own "let them die," said in anger to Spock in TUC... He visibly recoils after saying it.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top