Mileage will vary. It struck me as no worse than First Contact body horror, or the awful transporter death in TMP.That was just the last straw for me its cheap shock value
Mileage will vary. It struck me as no worse than First Contact body horror, or the awful transporter death in TMP.That was just the last straw for me its cheap shock value
Next generation, so Data is Spock's kid, right?I'd say that the general public probably know more bits from TOS than TNG, but they also probably can't tell the shows apart. "I like the guy with the ears. Is that the same show as the guy with the butt on his head?"
but most of those were characters with no real back story glorified extrasMileage will vary. It struck me as no worse than First Contact body horror, or the awful transporter death in TMP.
Unfortunately, due to circumstances beyond our control, that is what Icheb has been relegated to.but most of those were characters with no real back story glorified extras
That was dumb also and had no real build up and i have everyright to complain about a bad decison thats out of my controlUnfortunately, due to circumstances beyond our control, that is what Icheb has been relegated to.
Very much like the way David was disposed of during the Genesis Incident.
I never get this. They are supposed to be humans having real human experiences. It's still horrific.but most of those were characters with no real back story glorified extras
Is that the Mexican chick?Honestly, back when it was on the air, I had a conversation with a guy who watched Voyager every week. He was telling me that his favorite character was "the bald chick". It took me a while to realize he was talking about B'elanna.
... and in the last ten years what form of Trek has been most in the public eye...
Kirk, Spock, Dr. McCoy and Scotty ...
New actors playing representations of FIFTY YEAR OLD Trek Characters that have become Icons in modern culture.
Picard/TNG is just now starting to attain that prestige, it remains to be seen if it is able to achieve a similar status.
yeah but they alot of that the either never show or it has a point to them this is just classless this is nothing buch fridging to get some shockI never get this. They are supposed to be humans having real human experiences. It's still horrific.
Ok, how about Tasha Yar's backstory of her mom being killed and rape gangs a threat?
Not horrible enough? How about O'Brien being punished by imprisonment, where he becomes so paranoid he kills his friend?
Trek is full of darkness. Them being unnamed characters doesn't make it less dark. It makes it worse for me.
You go into Star Trek? You're not expecting the very first fucking scene in an episode being a character getting his eye pulled out of his socket and seeing the optic nerve snipped like a wire.
Hey! Targeted ads being broadcast on a spaceship, and one of them for "Snake Weed" and of course the ad has a Rastafarian-looking alien wearing 1960's/'70s Earth beatnik clothes acting like the stereotypical stoner. Because, yeah, that makes perfect fucking sense.
There was also just something unnecessarily "gruesome" about the death of Maddox. Granted not as bad as Icheb, but there way it was shot and portrayed was just a bit uncalled for. I mean couldn't he just have clutched his chest, gasped for breath a few times and then just fallen limp?
I didn't say you shouldn't, I was merely pointing out the folly of becoming too attached to minor characters in the Trek Universe.That was dumb also and had no real build up and i have every right to complain about a bad decision that's out of my control
Agree to disagree. Star Trek has done it before, will do it again. Doesn't make it less Star Trek, or optimistic or whatever.yeah but they alot of that the either never show or it has a point to them this is just classless this is nothing buch fridging to get some shock
3 movies laterI didn't say you shouldn't, I was merely pointing out the folly of becoming too attached to minor characters in the Trek Universe.
I too was very disappointed with my namesake (David) being killed, but I also saw the value of the powerful significance in how it affected the main character of the story.
Picard won't get much of a foothold for much of the same reason. It's frankly not good enough to cut through the noise.
The nostalgia factor is high, but the quality isn't high enough to truly make a lasting impact.
yes it has but i see no balance to this its so one sidedAgree to disagree. Star Trek has done it before, will do it again. Doesn't make it less Star Trek, or optimistic or whatever.
That's a horrifying scene. I skip that because it will make me cry.I didn't say you shouldn't, I was merely pointing out the folly of becoming too attached to minor characters in the Trek Universe.
I too was very disappointed with my namesake (David) being killed, but I also saw the value of the powerful significance in how it affected the main character of the story.
We'll circle around back to this in 10 years.
Story isn't over yet. Of course it's one sided. That's like being mad at Empire Strikes Back for being not happy enough.yes it has but i see no balance to this its so one sided
yes it has but i see no balance to this its so one sided
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.