• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Spoilers Star Trek: Picard General Discussion Thread

I've been seeing a lot of criticism of how Picard is taking so long getting the new band together, but my impression is that this season's storyline is as much about the journey as the destination. It's sort of an extended origin story for this chapter in Picard's life.
 
I've been seeing a lot of criticism of how Picard is taking so long getting the new band together, but my impression is that this season's storyline is as much about the journey as the destination. It's sort of an extended origin story for this chapter in Picard's life.

I don't have an issue with this. I just think that the way the story is set up, CBS should have released the entire season at once. I think waiting a week between episodes kills what little momentum the story has.
 
As it was meant to. Anything post-2009 can be considered "NuTrek."

I generally classify it as:
Old Trek = 1966-2005
New Trek = 2009-Present

"NuTrek", to me, specifically means the Kelvin Timeline. I think of it as a sub-set of New Trek.
Just like "Classic Trek", to me, specifically means TOS. I think of it as a sub-set of Old Trek.
 
For those who say PIC is taking too long to get off the ground from a spacefaring standpoint: remember that one idea for the concept of ENT was to spend the first season on Earth as Enterprise NX-01 was being constructed and the crew wouldn't have actually gotten into deep space until the second season. It would have been an Earthbound Trek series for at least one season and that could have proven far, far more controversial and divisive than any other creative choices that Berman and Braga made.
 
I don't have an issue with this. I just think that the way the story is set up, CBS should have released the entire season at once. I think waiting a week between episodes kills what little momentum the story has.
It works for our purposes. The forum would be a bloody nightmare if they dropped all the episodes at once.
 
I generally classify it as:
Old Trek = 1966-2005
New Trek = 2009-Present

"NuTrek", to me, specifically means the Kelvin Timeline.
Just like "Classic Trek", to me, specifically means TOS.

I think it's fair to draw a differentiation between TOS and the TOS movies and the Berman era, myself, as much as that era should be differentiated from the Kelvin and current series.
 
For those who say PIC is taking too long to get off the ground from a spacefaring standpoint: remember that one idea for the concept of ENT was to spend the first season on Earth as Enterprise NX-01 was being constructed and the crew wouldn't have actually gotten into deep space until the second season. It would have been an Earthbound Trek series for at least one season and that could have proven far, far more controversial and divisive than any other creative choices that Berman and Braga made.

Well, throughout the Berman era we generally had to wait a full 2 seasons before each series would get off the ground, if it ever did.
 
I think it's fair to draw a differentiation between TOS and the TOS movies and the Berman era, myself, as much as that era should be differentiated from the Kelvin and current series.

I'd call the Berman Era "Middle Trek" but then I'd have to keep explaining what I mean. It's not worth it. So I'll call it "Old Trek" or the "Berman Era". If I'm in a mood where I want to take a dig at it, then I'll just call it "Berman Trek".
 
C1qHz2q.jpg
Better than Luke but I wouldn't say "right", but I suppose that's all subjective.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top