So we'll change it to "someone dying". Not sure that is any better...
Again, it is biological - like salmon swimming upstream to … you know ... do "it." Not something to get all judgy about, sheesh. You take it all too serious.

So we'll change it to "someone dying". Not sure that is any better...
After a strong pilot, Picard took a big step backwards with this episode.
Where to begin...there was some outright terrible acting by the guest cast here. The Admiral arguing with Picard was terrible and that whole conversation was cliched. If Picard didn't get along with this admiral, why go to her in the first place? More than fair to point out that after trashing Starfleet, he wasn't likely to get a ship in the first place.
Even Sarek's assistants in "Sarek" could be a bit abrasive. Let's not pretend this is something new.Vulcans being evil, manipulative or just plain condescending pricks isn't really just an Enterprise/nuTrek thing... didn't DS9 have a literal Vulcan serial killer in one episode? And while Captain Solok from the baseball episode wasn't exactly what you'd call duplicitous or manipulative, he was a condescending prick and he did have a really unhealthy fixation on having to prove humans, and specifically, one single human he met at the Academy decades ago, inferior at every single opportunity. Enterprise's Jerk!Vulcans couldn't exist without him.
Even Sarek's assistants in "Sarek" could be a bit abrasive. Let's not pretend this is something new.
More that they are capable of a wide variety of behaviors. Including evil, immoral and negative .Really? Abrasive? Wow, the bar gets lower and lower and lower. "Damn those abrasive Vulcans. DAMN THEM ALL TOO HELL!"![]()
More that they are capable of a wide variety of behaviors. Including evil, immoral and negative .
Except, we've seen exactly what they are capable of, including murder, in the name of logic. That's why "capable of" is so important. They justify it through logic.What they are "capable" of is meaningless as it is general and vague.
Except, we've seen exactly what they are capable of, including murder, in the name of logic. That's why "capable of" is so important. They justify it through logic.
I cannot recall of any, aside from T'Pring's wonderful conspiracy to have Spock murdered by Stonn's hand or vice versa.When in TOS did they murder?
good enough for meI cannot recall of any, aside from T'Pring's wonderful conspiracy to have Spock murdered by Stonn's hand or vice versa.
I cannot recall of any, aside from T'Pring's wonderful conspiracy to have Spock murdered by Stonn's hand or vice versa.
Conspiracy: the action of plotting or conspiring.Not a conspiracy as T'Pring invoked a legitimate right within the process of Pon Farr.
Did someone already notice the questionable hygiene of these people?
After they get out of bed they put their clothes on and go to work!!! How about a shower, pigs!!!![]()
Did someone already notice the questionable hygiene of these people?
First, they have sex in their underwear but that's not the worst of it. After they get out of bed they put their clothes on and go to work!!! How about a shower, pigs!!!![]()
Conspiracy: the action of plotting or conspiring.
T'Pring plotted to either have Stonn either way, either by Kirk stepping up as her champion and dying, or Kirk killing Spock and she would be free to marry Stonn. She states as much to Spock at the end of the episode.
Sounds like a conspiracy to me...![]()
Nina Hagen and the Pon Farr's...
edit:
Well, we need to see if Hugh is somehow connected to the Romulan Borg experiments, and if Picard pulled a "Ceti Alpha V" on Hugh and his group after Descent (i.e. never checked up on them)I quite enjoyed the episode. It continues to reinforce what we already know about Picard himself - a man of conviction, of morals. I'm immensely curious about what appears to be a group effort regarding the Artefact, and how deep the Romulan agenda goes...
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.