Neither do I, but that doesn't stop me...I don't have time to read the previous 3000 posts

Neither do I, but that doesn't stop me...I don't have time to read the previous 3000 posts
You have one job...Neither do I, but that doesn't stop me...![]()
I only just saw this comment, and I had the same Hitchhiker's-evoking reaction. From the original radio series:[...]I still think the idea of one neuron containing all that was Data is Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy level science by way of using a piece of cupcake to extrapolate the entire universe.
Rape is not family friendly.
It is one of those edgy grimdark hallmark moments though. I mean I thought The Crow was the beginning and the end of cool when I was a moody teenager, and y’know, it’s still pretty good. But there are other flavours of story. And it’s not a flavour that suits Trek.
I only just saw this comment, and I had the same Hitchhiker's-evoking reaction. From the original radio series:
The Total Perspective Vortex derives its picture of the whole Universe on the principle of extrapolated matter analyses. To explain — since every piece of matter in the Universe is in some way affected by every other piece of matter in the Universe, it is in theory possible to extrapolate the whole of creation — every sun, every planet, their orbits, their composition and their economic and social history from, say, one small piece of fairy cake.
Does Data has DNA that can be replicated to generate growth? Genuinely curious.Why wouldn't one of Data's neurons suffice for the task depicted?
With due respect, again, I disagree. Rape has been featured in Trek in the past and rarely treated with any sort of gravity or severity.
The impression I got was that there's something about positronic brains (or maybe it's just Soong's design, specifically) that works kind of like holographic memory; so within each positronic neuron would reside the instructions to reconstitute the entire network. So maybe not literally like DNA, but sort of, at least in general principle if not the specific mechanics. If so then Maddox was right: dismantling Data would have allowed him to build more...Does Data has DNA that can be replicated to generate growth? Genuinely curious.
Which is, quite terrible and frustrating, given the gravitas that is assigned to that scene. Shatner even notes in "Star Trek Memories" how they fought for that scene and then it was still edited differently than how it was shot due to studio directive.In some cases it has even been revered. The Kirk-Uhura kiss in TOS episode "Plato's Stepchildren" for example. No way that wasn't a rape scene [neither Kirk nor Uhura gave consent, in fact, they were both portrayed as fighting it], but gets hailed as a television landmark moment.![]()
Interesting. I was curious has to how the memory might be built, if one positronic neuron would be sufficient or if a network was required. Because, when people go "Oh, we clone all the time" its like, "Yes, because in a cell is sufficient DNA information to do so." If a positronic neuron has a similar memory and "DNA" style instructions then it becomes more understandable. However, my initial reaction was "Doesn't make much sense. It would be like finding a fragment of a hard drive and restoring all of its memory."The impression I got was that there's something about positronic brains (or maybe it's just Soong's design, specifically) that works kind of like holographic memory; so within each positronic neuron would reside the instructions to reconstitute the entire network. So maybe not literally like DNA, but sort of, at least in general principle if not the specific mechanics. If so then Maddox was right: dismantling Data would have allowed him to build more...
My working theory for now is that said fragment of Data's brain combined with Borg nano-tech allowed for a recreation of his neural net, but not his memories. Hence: daughters. The synthetic DNA imagery in the title sequence could be very literal.
Interesting. I was curious has to how the memory might be built, if one positronic neuron would be sufficient or if a network was required. Because, when people go "Oh, we clone all the time" its like, "Yes, because in a cell is sufficient DNA information to do so." If a positronic neuron has a similar memory and "DNA" style instructions then it becomes more understandable. However, my initial reaction was "Doesn't make much sense. It would be like finding a fragment of a hard drive and restoring all of its memory."
Yup. But the thing is, real-world physics is pretty much like that anyway. Something that clearly doesn't make an ounce of sense is how the world works, deep down.
Also, growing creatures out of single cells of other creatures is pretty much standard fare. Why wouldn't one of Data's neurons suffice for the task depicted?
Timo Saloniemi
I have to go with 'no, it doesn't.' The whole android technobable aspect certainly was one thing that made me raise my eyebrow in the first episode.It would mean that every single neuron would have to have all the information collected by ever single other neuron in Data's brain. Even if there are only as many neurons in his brain as a human beings, this would be saying that Data's brain is built with over 100 billion levels of redundancy, not to mention a memory storage capacity of each neuron has to be practically infinite. The question is, does this make sense based on how Data has been presented?
Which brings up the question: if an android's personality and even life can be resurrected from just one positronic neuron then was Lal truly dead? It's possible Data didn't understand that there might be a possibility of resurrecting his daughter using the positronic neuron technique(especially since, presumably, Bruce Maddox had yet to discover or invent the technique) but cascade failure might not have been the final end of Lal if one neuron could have been retrieved and used to "reboot" her in another android body.
And everyone knows Surak did it years ago, and his androids could even have babies....true artificial life....![]()
And this ties Picard in with the real reason the Romulans left Vulcan.
We might be seeing synth DNA in the intro sequenceDoes Data has DNA that can be replicated to generate growth? Genuinely curious.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.