I thought "hipster" beards were well groomed and stylized, not the scruffy look sported by the Romulan.
All beards worn by anyone under the age of 40 count now as hipster beards.
Jason
I thought "hipster" beards were well groomed and stylized, not the scruffy look sported by the Romulan.
.
Star Trek really isn't that imaginative with its aliens.
That's a lot of hipstersAll beards worn by anyone under the age of 40 count now as hipster beards.
Jason
It’s not about getting it right but making an effort IMHO.Fashion trends come and go. Most futurism predictions of fashion rarely come true.
No, not in any way that would suggest major changes to it post reconstruction. The Breen barely destroyed the one location they were firing at. Another question might have been why didn’t they nuke it and do a better job?Earth wasn't attacked during the Dominion War? Huh, weird...
I don't know why that would make more changes.
it’s relevant because it establishes setting.I see no need to have there in the story if it isn't relevant to the story.
This isn't a story about future Earth to inspire the masses. If it were a story about future Earth and that's what I saw then I would lament it. But, it's not. Nor is Trek tech meant to inspire. It is stories about humanity and not their fashion or technology.
That's a lot of hipsters
But, the production team gets castigated at every turn. This is not a hill worth dying on for them, in my opinion, largely because it isn't relevant to the story.It’s not about getting it right but making an effort IMHO.
Yes, I stand corrected regarding the attack, however, wars can impact more than just landscapes. Supply lines, paranoia, and such all could be impacted.No, not in any way that would suggest major changes to it post reconstruction. The Breen barely destroyed the one location they were firing at. Another question might have been why didn’t they nuke it and do a better job?
Wars can have impact in many different ways.Huh? Didn’t you just make the point that wars change the landscape?
Setting is already established.it’s relevant because it establishes setting.
Which follows along with Roddenberry's original idea-the technology is not the focus. The technology exists in the background, doesn't require commentary, and isn't the inspiration of the series. It is just tools that are used in the daily grind.The sci-fi stuff without being the point has always inspired just by being there. PIC still does a lot of it...he visits his quantum archive, there are flash transporters, Daj is an android, there’s a friggin Borg in it...but it’s lackluster as well.
What this has to do with anything? Can you tell from which part of UK Narek's accent is from?Maybe but I can't tell most American accents apart. I mean I can hear Southern,OKlahoma,Texas though they sort of can blend together as well. New Yorker but basically only if someone is yelling and acting rude and Boston if someone is yelling and acting rude or talking about the Red Sox. Maybe Minnesota but maybe not Minnesota and I have just seen to many episodes of Fargo. Also Valley girl but since this isn't 1984 anymore that doesn't do me any good.
Jason
To me the easy fix is to avoid modern slang and enough with the emo beards. Also not sure about British and Italian sounding Romulans. It seems to me aliens should at least sound a little less human than they do.
Jason
But, the production team gets castigated at every turn. This is not a hill worth dying on for them, in my opinion, largely because it isn't relevant to the story.
Setting is already established.
It’s not either or.The story is about the people.
I still think the Kelvinverse has the best depiction of earth. It felt both futuristic but also with modern touches but modern touches the tv shows never really did. The bars still felt like bars for example and the police officer has the speeder bike and face helmet but he is still a cop in the same way we have cops here today and not just a security officer like we see on the tv shows.
Jason
Their job is to tell the story. That's what they did.Their “dying” is absurd. It’s their job.
How so? Genuinely? Because of fashion? In a replicator society fashion could change even more frequently than now.It’s reestablished less futuristic, yes.
To reiterate it wasn't essential to the story. Thus, they didn't focus on it because the story was about people, and the setting was a given.It’s not either or.
To reiterate, I love the series. I’ve seen the premier 5 times I’m so happy with all of this. But the series does leave me underwhelmed on this subject.
Wow- Trek really IS about a hopeful future. Look at all those tall buildings Boston has in 400 years. Right now, it’s tough to get anything built over 15 stories!
I thought hipster beards were really long and thick affairs. Narek's beard is nowhere near long or thick enough to qualify as a hipster beard.I thought "hipster" beards were well groomed and stylized, not the scruffy look sported by the Romulan.
I prefer the colloquial usage to what one TNG writer called "the stilted Star Trek language."
I thought hipster beards were really long and thick affairs. Narek's beard is nowhere near long or thick enough to qualify as a hipster beard.
Their job is to tell the story. That's what they did.
How so? Genuinely? Because of fashion? In a replicator society fashion could change even more frequently than now.
To reiterate it wasn't essential to the story. Thus, they didn't focus on it because the story was about people, and the setting was a given.
Could they have done better? Maybe. But, it isn't Star Trek's job to inspire humanity by brilliant futurism.
I’m sure the trough is still in the mens room...There's a sign mentioning the London Kings, so baseball could be a thing again.
I wonder what Fenway Park looks like in 2399?![]()
The inspiration is from the characters not the tech.Yes, it is. It's been a HUGE part of Trek from the beginning and in every incarnation. And fans have loved it for it.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.