We'll let's just hope they officially name Planet Nine Persephone even though there's already an asteroid named that.
Now can we just get over the fact that Pluto isn't a planet anyway but Persephone might be? And oh, this brings me to another issue: the irony.
Pluto/Hades raped Persephone in the myth. But Pluto isn't a planet, while Persephone is. Should we just embrace the irony? Larry Niven had his Persephone in his Known Space series, and made it a gas giant nearly the size of Saturn with an inclination of 120 degrees (thus retrograde). While his Known Space series was written while Pluto was still a planet, the books do not count Pluto as a planet because it is an escaped moon of Neptune (in his first novel World of Ptavvs Pluto was knocked into a heliocentric orbit when Knazol's ship crashed way too hard on it).
Furthermore, I have The Magic School Bus Gets Lost in the Solar System at my school, and the book does mention the old theory that Pluto is an escaped Neptunian moon and not a true planet at all. Anyhow, Pluto (and Charon) are far more likely to be oversized comet nuclei than escaped moons of Neptune.
So let's just embrace the irony that the molester isn't a planet while the victim is.
Going back to the naming problem, if Planet Nine won't be officially named Persephone or Proserpina, then hopefully they'll try Proserpine. That's a little easier to pronounce than Proserpina and has the same number of syllables as Persephone, and will help distinguish it from asteroids #26 and #399. Or even try Persephone's variants Persephatta and Persephassa!