If the only way to praise it is to bash something else I'll take the loss.That's your loss.
If the only way to praise it is to bash something else I'll take the loss.That's your loss.
Picard.
My point is precisely that this is a forum, a place for the exchange of ideas.Especially if they go on youtube bitching and throwing out completely unsubstantiated rumors.
Its not logical. It is pure emotional frustration at Picard being used to tear Discovery down.BY what logic? Because discovery could learn from it? Not sure I follow the logic
I know you want to bash it as much as possible,
Let's dial back the confrontationalism, please. The golden rule around here is "the post, not the poster."Did you watch the episode?
Well, he does have his strange Martian power over women....but, to be very fair, it were Spock's charms, we're talking about. Those are hard to resist for anyone
Also, IIRC, there was a reference to a "Galactic Conference" back in STIII.True. Pike did describe them as a Galactic Federation in Discovery. Something I thought was a massive exaggeration.
Not sure what this is supposed to be. Are you quoting a Twitter post, or trying to respond to one here? If the latter, best to do that on Twitter.John E. Price @thejohnprice
Mostly, and I can't stress this part enough: Yes it has memberberries, yes it's dark and moody, but #Picard ep 1 wasn't a nauseatingly self-indulgent, franchise-offending, genre-illiterate, inept and grotesque production that Kurtzman is known for. So, that's an improvement!
Comparing the competency to [Discovery]: a lot of the plot points in EP 1 would have been stretched over three-four episodes in [Disco] pissing off everyone. Here, they're set up, the twist happens and you move forward. This is a good thing.
A lot of complaints will be "this isn't Gene's vision" and well, first of all, that's overrated. Second, this is a story about forging from failure. There's nothing more "Gene's vision" than striving to be better. Will the show live up to that? I dunno, but we'll see.
If the only way to praise it is to bash something else I'll take the loss.
Geordi isn't dead. There's an interview where Beyer said everyone is still alive and could potentially appear.
My choice. I loathe comparisons. Either it stands on it's own or it doesn't.Why would you let someone's opinion on something decide whether or not you would watch it? I can praise it a lot of different ways, interesting setup, great casting, fan service that actually works in the service of the story. But comparisons are going to be made, that is the nature of the beast.
If the only way to praise it is to bash something else I'll take the loss.
If the only way to praise it is to bash something else I'll take the loss.
So much for drama. Behind-the-scenes folks need to stay behind-the-scenes.
I won't compare the two. One has no bearing on the other for me.It isn’t the only way.
But it is true.
But...put it this way, series one of DSC could have learnt a lot from series 2.
I find it extremely likely that any long term Trek fan, whether they like DSC or not, is going to possibly rate Picards first episode higher than DSCs.
Its not logical. It is pure emotional frustration at Picard being used to tear Discovery down.
Those people are insane. Mallrats is a masterpiece of nerd cinema and was several years ahead of its timeMost people I've heard or read over the past 25 years think Mallrats is garbage.
which is true.A lot of Trek fans think ENT sucks the vacuum of space.
Star Trek: Picard could learn alot from Discovery. Picard, while "not a sequel to TNG" doesn't establish much. If you don't know who Picard is, his quirks, his relationship with Data, who Data is, his background, the show doesn't give you much to work with. Discovery is standalone, having to establish almost all its moving parts, with continuity refs as flavor and only the ubiquitous Star Trek setting to assist.
Discovery handles serialization slightly better, usually providing a good three-act structure to every episode. Picard's first episode doesn't seem to be too detached from the overall serial. It starts with him at home and ends with him leaving, there are three acts, but it doesn't feel like a proper establishing episode. Not much happens, odd to say, compared to every other series opener. And at 46 minutes, it's shorter than all the TNG on spinoffs (which had two-parters/feature length presentations).
There. That should satisfy your curiosity from the point of view of someone not "bashing" the only other modern Star Trek series.
And alot of this is too early to tell. Maybe Remembrance will be the greatest opener of all time, when compared to the series and how it fits the overall narrative. If you love Discovery, give Picard a try. Don't ever measure your potential enjoyment of a product based on the opinion of an internet fanatic. Even mine.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.