Marvel's history has never truly fit with the MCU
Clearly Disney is ashamed of comics.
Marvel's history has never truly fit with the MCU
Hopefully since they were making such a big deal out of all of that in the promotional stuff, they're find someone who will stick to that since it's what people are going to be expecting.That is disappointing and a little worrisome. Derrickson seemed to have a clear vision for the sequel speculatively with (Nightmare) and I liked what he talked about making it a scary film (within the realm of the MCU, of course). Hopefully whoever replaces him is similar in fashion.
As far as I can remember, they never explicitly said there weren't other superheroes around. Steve was a pretty big deal as Captain America, but that could just be because he was the first person to be enhanced like that. There's nothing there to prevent there from having been an artificial being like The Torch, or a being who came by his powers naturally like Namor.Marvel's history has never truly fit with the MCU, so you would end up seeing a number of big changes to the basic concepts and/or characters. Then, there's the idea of a Human Torch--there was one on display at the World's Fair in Captain America: The First Avenger, but at no time during MCU Cap's WW2 adventures, was there even a throwaway reference to a Torch being a "living", active being in the world, so something so...fantastic would need to be explained,
Maybe there were other things going on that characters like Namor or The Torch were dealing with. Hydra might have been the big threat Cap and Co. were dealing with, but there's no reason there couldn't have been other things going on that other people were dealing with at the same time.along with why he was never around to be involved in any of the major, Cap-oriented operations against the Red Skull/Hydra--which were presented as the greatest threat to the world...
Not that tight, there are those montages that jump around in time, so there's probably still room for a quick team up if they wanted to squeeze one in there.It would be rather awkward to force fit "new" history/flashbacks into Cap's, when his appeared to be a series of tightly structured events.
As far as I can remember, they never explicitly said there weren't other superheroes around. Steve was a pretty big deal as Captain America, but that could just be because he was the first person to be enhanced like that. There's nothing there to prevent there from having been an artificial being like The Torch, or a being who came by his powers naturally like Namor.
Maybe there were other things going on that characters like Namor or The Torch were dealing with. Hydra might have been the big threat Cap and Co. were dealing with, but there's no reason there couldn't have been other things going on that other people were dealing with at the same time.
Not that tight, there are those montages that jump around in time, so there's probably still room for a quick team up if they wanted to squeeze one in there.
Yeah, they are pretty obviously laying the groundwork for the Young Avengers. They seem to be establishing Billy and Tommy AKA Wiccan and Speed in WandaVision and Ms. Marvel (not a part of the original Young Avengers team, but she's an obvious inclusion) in her own show, and finally Kate in her and Clint's show.Interesting. I wonder what this big plot point they want set up before it is? The guy who wrote the articles wonders if they want to introduce the Young Avengers first, and I could see that.
There's also Cassie Lang to consider, who should most likely be getting her powers in Ant-man 3.
There's also Cassie Lang to consider, who should most likely be getting her powers in Ant-man 3.
But I don't know why any of this would delay Hawkeye. It makes perfect sense for Hawkeye to introduce Kate Bishop and then lead into the Young Avengers, just like Ms. Marvel and all these other properties. There's no need to hold that show back until after the Young Avengers are already a thing.
They also want Hailee Steinfeld as Kate Bishop and it sounds like Apple is playing hardball when it comes to her contract for Dickinson, so Disney might be waiting for that to be resolved.
It does have a bit of that "I've been instructed not to say anything" vibe to it.I think I read somewhere a few weeks ago she herself was doubting about the part after the allegations against Renner.
*EDITED* So, the phrasing is a bit odd.....But here you go: https://heroichollywood.com/hailee-steinfeld-jeremy-renner-hawkeye-doubt/
The Morbius trailer came out today, and for those who haven't seen it yet, or been to the Spider-Verse thread, it does appear to confirm that the Spider-verse movies do take place in the MCU.
I prefer to think of it as a sort of Venn diagram situation where there's an MCU bubble, an SMU bubble, and then the Tom Holland movies exist in that overlapping zone between them.
True, but until a character who was established in a non-Sony MCU movie (i.e. any of the Avengers, Guardians, etc.) shows up in a non-Holland SMU movie, I'm content to go with my current preference.That would imply that the only place you'd see overlap between them is in the Spidey movies themselves. The Morbius trailer has already disproven that. It has two elements that appear to be explicit references to elements from Homecoming and Far from Home. And a third has been rumored --the possible appearance of J.K. Simmons as Jameson.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.