Generally true, but has no relevance whatsoever, to what I'm talking about here.Because white people get to pretend most of the time that racism doesn't exist - or at least that it doesn't matter much.
Generally true, but has no relevance whatsoever, to what I'm talking about here.Because white people get to pretend most of the time that racism doesn't exist - or at least that it doesn't matter much.
What's interesting is back in the 90's or maybe early when they were talking about doing a Superman one of my personal choices was Denzel Washington. I know he made more sense to me than Nick Cage. He in most of his roles has a strong moral code to them. A inner strenght. Of course back then I had felt racism was less of a issue which makes feel naive after Trump won. I do agree you can do a story that isn't about racism but can it be done in current political climate? Especially if Trump wins again. JasonYes, if it is written that way. As long as the writing is competent, it will all seem as "realistic" as comic movie premises ever do.
I'm glad you brought up Hancock. Now this was a movie that could have easily accommodated a racism storyline. I have no idea as to why they didn't but I can say that that not having that storyline didn't affect the quality of the moie. Most people's criticisms of that movie had nothing to do with missing a racism storyline.
One reason the Hancock writers probably didn't feel compelled to write a racism storyline was because Hancock wasn't black. The actor playing Hancock was black, but the character was not specifically any particular race.
The Hancock character was treated the same way all of the Superman characters have been treated, no particular race or religion. Likewise, Superman has never been "white". There is nothing about the character that demands he be "white", in-universe.
The only reason you and most others think the character is white is because Supes has always been played by a white actor. He was drawn as white in the comics solely because, how else would he have been drawn in the '30's?
Fans (including you) need to become a bit more sophisticated in their thinking about race.
Demanding that race be an aspect of Superman's story solely because Superman is played by a black actor is "ghettoizing" black actors. It perpetrates the idea that "white" is the default setting and anything that is not part of that setting is "other" and requires an "explanation".
If presenting Jordan/Superman with no racial aspect is viewed by some as running away from dealing with racism, then so be it. That should be thought of as the viewers' problem.
Not really. Not to me. I want Jordan to play Kryptonian, Kal-El, son of Jor-El, raised in Smallville after coming to earth and being adopted by the Kents. There does not "need" to be even a hint of racism in Clark's childhood (or adulthood). I don't think there should be any alternate universe. Make it the real universe.
If the movie isn't as successful as they want it to be (just like most of it's predecessors), then re-cast the role with whomever (how about Idris Elba?), same as they have done with Routh and (perhaps) Cavil.
I see no reason whatsoever why MBJ should not play Superman.
The only things that have to stay constant are his name (Kal-El) and home planet (Krypton). There's nothing that ties Superman to any specific race or physical appearance.
Um....noIt's like James Bond. All we know about him is that he's a British spy. He could be of any race. Same story here.
Except for every comic, television and movie interpretation of him since 1938
Um....no
"Fleming decided that Bond should resemble both American singer Hoagy Carmichael and himself and in Casino Royale, Vesper Lynd remarks, "Bond reminds me rather of Hoagy Carmichael, but there is something cold and ruthless." Likewise, in Moonraker, Special Branch Officer Gala Brand thinks that Bond is "certainly good-looking ... Rather like Hoagy Carmichael in a way. That black hair falling down over the right eyebrow. Much the same bones. But there was something a bit cruel in the mouth, and the eyes were cold."
It wasn't just Johnny Storms that was changed, they also changed Reed Richards. This created a backlash against the movie before it was even released which hurt ticket sales. Of course the movie was bad , but the point I was making was that alienating the very audience that you need to come and see your movie is not a tactic for success. Casting Jordan as Superman is like trying to cast Danny DeVito as Batman.It doesn't work. Either cast Superman right or make your own character.@ichab The race switching for Johnny Storm was NOT the reason the movie failed. It failed because it was a bad movie and would have failed no matter who played Johnny.
Except for every comic, television and movie interpretation of him since 1938
Um....no
"Fleming decided that Bond should resemble both American singer Hoagy Carmichael and himself and in Casino Royale, Vesper Lynd remarks, "Bond reminds me rather of Hoagy Carmichael, but there is something cold and ruthless." Likewise, in Moonraker, Special Branch Officer Gala Brand thinks that Bond is "certainly good-looking ... Rather like Hoagy Carmichael in a way. That black hair falling down over the right eyebrow. Much the same bones. But there was something a bit cruel in the mouth, and the eyes were cold."
The books were quite specific about what James Bond looked like. With Superman it's even worse because the image in the public's mind of the character is so ingrained that changing it would only alienate the very people you are trying to get to see your movie. The box office of Black Panther in contrast to Fantastic Four shows that the public is willing to accept black superheros, but not so accepting of established characters being changed.
If we have to go all the way back to 1946 to find an example of Superman confronting racism in a significant and meaningful way, surely it's overdue.Are we forgetting the Radio Show's famous Superman vs the Klan story?
I'd watch it.Casting Jordan as Superman is like trying to cast Danny DeVito as Batman.
Christian Bale.Then I really wanna see who they get for the Penguin.
DeVito would have been more believable than Michael Keaton.I'd watch it.
The image of Bond in the books did look like Hoagy Carmichael -- who looked like David Niven, who looked like Ian Flemng, which is really who the literary character was modeled after. Fleming had done a stint with some branch of intelligence in Britain before writing the Bond books. Bond was only described with white features because, coincidentally, Fleming had white features.
None of this means squat with respect to Bond or Superman having to be a particular race. Both are fictional characters whose race and looks are NOT integral to who the characters are. We all know that Superman was drawn as white in the comic just as Bond was described in the books with white features, but there is nothing about who the characters are that demands either be drawn as white or played by a white actor.The books were quite specific about what James Bond looked like. With Superman it's even worse because the image in the public's mind of the character is so ingrained that changing it would only alienate the very people you are trying to get to see your movie.
As someone has already astutely pointed out, the FF movie didn't fail because Michael B. Jordan was cast as Johnny Storm. What you suggest here is pretty much an alt-right talking point, that movies with POC or women in non-traditional roles, or LGBTQ characters, in roles that were previously manned by white men, will bomb.The box office of Black Panther in contrast to Fantastic Four shows that the public is willing to accept black superheros, but not so accepting of established characters being changed.
Umm...no.DeVito would have been more believable than Michael Keaton.
Sorry, I know there is a nostalgia for Batman 89, but I saw this in the theatres. Although I've grown to appreciate its positive qualities over time the worst thing about the movie for me was easily Keaton. He didn't look or act like he was capable of changing a tire, let alone being Batman. His Batsuit was horrible, designed to compensate for the actor's physical stature, that created a type of Batman that relied heavily on technology rather than his innate physiology. As Bruce Wayne, Keaton just missed the mark as well. The whole plot of revealing his identity to Vale was poorly done.Umm...no.
It doesn't have to have anything to do with racism, some of us are just traditionalists. Heck, I was pissed when the new Galactica changed Col. Tigh to a white guy, and that's a muuuuch lesser 'established" character than Supes or Bond.If you have some reason Bond or Superman need to be shown as white, other than because that is the way they were originally presented, please let me know.
It doesn't have to have anything to do with racism, some of us are just traditionalists.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.