Speaking of Tarkin, should they ever make a Tarkin movie with him rising through the ranks up to serving Vader, they should pick Cillian Murphy.
Tarkin could have been via hologram but Leia had to be aboard the Tantative IV as its next stop was Tatooine....
Speaking of Tarkin, should they ever make a Tarkin movie with him rising through the ranks up to serving Vader, they should pick Cillian Murphy.
^^ I don't see how you can do a story about the Death Star without it's commander. Having Tarkin appear only as a hologram wouldn't have worked.
I so can’t see that. Other than the high cheekbones, there’s no resemblance. The guy who plays Arthur on Peaky Blinders looks more like Peter Cushing than Murphy does.
True, but the more I thought about it, I realized that a person's facial structure changes drastically the more one ages. We've only ever seen Tarkin as an older man, not a younger one.
I mean, if one takes the view that it doesn’t matter that the actor playing a younger version of a character looks like the older one, so long as they capture their essence, well, fair enough.
That was my thought, but perhaps you have a point. I just thought he'd be close enough. We've seen many performances of historical characters that have looked really nothing like them, but managed to capture the essence of their character.
I never found Donald Glover convincing as a young Billy Dee Williams)
So, what brought me to suggest Cillian Murphy was his gravitas, and to me he's shown similar qualities in Peaky Blinders, the stare being one of them.
I agree with you. It's not his overall look really, it's Cillian Murphy's eyes.
That's it. It's not that he has particularly menacing eyes, but a set of commanding eyes. He doesn't have to say much, but one knows he means business, particularly when he's looking at someone and able to make them quiver. And then there are the quiet introspective moments where he's just gazing out, and all of that really reminds me of Tarkin.
No, I haven't seen Red Eyes. Is that a movie he's in?
But instead, we'll be getting THE MATRIX 4.![]()
I think Reeves and the Wachowskis should try something new by combining a couple of franchises.It might be good. Reaves and everybody will be back.
ABC is still kicking itself over the fact that they turned down the pitch for the show that started it all, All In The Family, back in the late sixties. this is them trying to cash in on what they missed decades ago.On the coattails of a new cast preforming freshly dug up scripts of "All in the Family" and "The Jeffersons", dreamful stagnation also rears its head again in regurgitating "Good Times":
https://urbanhollywood411.com/2019/11/05/good-times-all-in-the-family-remakes-coming-to-abc/
DYN-O-MITE!
I loved the original shows (Esther Rolle is definitely missed and when John Amos left the show floundered) but why remake them as carbon copy when this isn't the era of Shakespeare from 1590 when few playwrights, much less ideas, even existed? Just swapping topical figures' names in scripts, assuming they're doing even that, seems a bit lame, but then again Shakespeare's plays have also played out and as verbatim for centuries, or the few one-off times when they replaced ye olde bantereth with then-contemporary equivalents.
Of course, Shakespeare didn't have home video and I'm only bringing him up for historical purposes... just think if a meddler went back in time with a betamax recorder (new for only $1199 at Sears forty years ago!) and other related operational equipment?
I only know of one, a tv series set in the modern day.So how many remakes/reboots of Kung Fu is this now? https://www.denofgeek.com/us/movies/kung-fu/285464/kung-fu-remake-movie-david-leitch
I only know of one, a tv series set in the modern day.
I remember after Rogue One voicing a concern that someday we'd end up with live actors being digitally created for movies rather than actually having them do the movies themselves. I hadn't considered dead actors being recreated to play new characters. That's pretty fucked up.
Yeah, I don’t think anyone could claim that Anthony Hopkins or Frank Langella are the spitting image of Richard Nixon but they both got Oscar nominated for playing him. Or, sticking with sci-fi, of the new Star Trek cast only Zachary Quinto really looks like the original actor playing his part, but Chris Pine etc do a good job in capturing the essence of their original counterparts (and of course any differences can be explained away because it’s a different timeline). But Star Wars definitely seems to have tried to keep the physical resemblance when trying to cast younger versions of its characters (potentially unpopular opinion - I never found Donald Glover convincing as a young Billy Dee Williams).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.