Yeah. That's what Enterprise does to people.AH! Sorry. Misunderstood.
I apologize, but I couldn't resist. No offense was intended.
Yeah. That's what Enterprise does to people.AH! Sorry. Misunderstood.
Are you really going to compare those apples and oranges? The TOS bridge was ahead of its time, and its "sparse" design was part of the larger clean, uncluttered aesthetic followed by Matt Jefferies during all three seasons of TOS. The TSFS Excelsior bridge, on the other hand, looks like someone looked at the storyboards, then at the budget, then back at the storyboards, then back at the budget, threw up their hands, and said, "Shit, throw something together real quick. Blinking lights behind black glass looks futuristic, right?"And before anyone reminds us how ugly they felt the NX bridge is- remember, the 1960s Enterprise was almost just as sparse as that NX bridge. Yet Donnie, and others, lovingly recreated it all the same.
I thought it was only the stage with the Genesis planet that caught fire?The impression I got was that they had no money and the stage had burned down.
Speaking as a dedicated Enterprise fan:Yeah. That's what Enterprise does to people.
I apologize, but I couldn't resist. No offense was intended.
Yeah. That's what Enterprise does to people.
I apologize, but I couldn't resist. No offense was intended.
IIRC, a large portion of the refit bridge was water damaged (not fire damaged) when in storage between films, which is why very little of it was shown at the end of TVH, with the front half re-done in TNG for the battle bridge and Stargazer (I very much dislike what they did with that amazing set), and replaced entirely for TFF, with the exception of the two turbolift alcoves, which survived all the way to Nemesis.Are you really going to compare those apples and oranges? The TOS bridge was ahead of its time, and its "sparse" design was part of the larger clean, uncluttered aesthetic followed by Matt Jefferies during all three seasons of TOS. The TSFS Excelsior bridge, on the other hand, looks like someone looked at the storyboards, then at the budget, then back at the storyboards, then back at the budget, threw up their hands, and said, "Shit, throw something together real quick. Blinking lights behind black glass looks futuristic, right?"
I thought it was only the stage with the Genesis planet that caught fire?
We've talked about thsi several times in my various threads, so I must correct you. However, I don't know what's real and what's not these days regarding this story, since it's been retold so many times in so many different ways.IIRC, a large portion of the refit bridge was water damaged (not fire damaged) when in storage between films, which is why very little of it was shown at the end of TVH, with the front half re-done in TNG for the battle bridge and Stargazer (I very much dislike what they did with that amazing set), and replaced entirely for TFF, with the exception of the two turbolift alcoves, which survived all the way to Nemesis.
I don't think the battle bridge viewscreen is the same viewscreen used on TMP-TSFS bridge. First, the battle bridge viewscreen is mounted on a wall that is curved in diameter but is vertically straight, versus the TMP bridge viewscreen being mounted across 1.5 domed bridge sections that are curved both in diameter and height, and the frame being curved to fit. Second, it's definitely not the same style frame, and they appear to have different width/height ratios.I'm pretty sure the viewscreen survived; it shows up on one of the ships in "The Outrageous Okona," on the Lantree in "Unnatural Selection" and in the starbase courtroom in "Measure of a Man"; the fact that they were actively using it for TNG probably led Herman Zimmerman to just design and build a new one.
I don't think so. Both the frames and the walls they're mounted on are too disimilar. The corners of the viewscreen frames are also completely different diameters. My guess that the Farpoint viewscreen is a totally new unit.I don't suppose there's any way they could have dismantled the TMP viewscreen and reworked it into the one we first saw in "Farpoint"?
I have no information on this other than what I remember reading in Starlog around that time period, and my (obviously faulty) recollection is that the scene at the end of Star Trek IV was shot from that one angle because everything else was water-damaged and therefore not shown.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.