Hell, 'Logan' was more or less what a Ben Kenobi movie might look like and that seemed to go over well!![]()
Not sure I see a point in a Kenobi series? Creepy old man keeps an eye on a kid for twenty years in a desert wasteland?
Cramming “adventures” into that time period just reminds me of Discovery and Michael Burnham all over again.
- Feeling guilty over the death of Schmi and its effect on Anakin, Obi-Wan decides to help slaves on Tatooine escape to freedom.Not sure I see a point in a Kenobi series? Creepy old man keeps an eye on a kid for twenty years in a desert wasteland?
There are a bunch of things you could do that don't contradict any established film canon.
Why wait when you can already start being relentlessly negative based on absolutely no information about a show that hasn't even been officially confirmed yet?Just wondering if they actually have a story to tell or are cramming something in for the sake of cramming something in? Guess we'll see.![]()
Why wait when you can already start being relentlessly negative based on absolutely no information about a show that hasn't even been officially confirmed yet?
I'd rather see the creepy old man Ben sweeping up his hut for 3 hours
Dude, you already hit Peak Bill when you compared it to Season 2 of Discovery based solely on the fact that they're both prequels, and we all know how you feel about Discovery.
One of the From the Journal of Ben Kenobi issues of the current Marvel comics series is similar to that.- While at Mos Eisley spaceport, he learns that the Hutts are pressuring the local moisture farmers for protection money and the farmers, led by Owen Lars, are planning to stand up to them. In order to prevent bloodshed that might get Luke killed, Obi-Wan first tries to use his old Clone Wars familiarity with Jabba (from the mission to rescue his son) and then later the Jedi Mind Trick to convince Jabba to back off, both to no avail, and making him an enemy of the Hutts. He ends up making a compromise or doing something which angers Lars and causes them not to talk ever again.
I'd watch it.A riff on Saved by the Bell, with Princess Leia and her friends in high school?
I compared it generally to Discovery, cramming into the cracks of a franchise past versus moving forward.
Could they do a great Kenobi show? Sure, I'll absolutely give it a try. I'm usually pretty honest about posting what I think, even if my earlier thoughts end up being wrong. I loved Solo. I hated Rogue One. At the same time, yet another franchise is taking the easy way out to garner eyeballs. Hanging everything on nostalgia instead of pressing forward.
I understand it is all about making money, I'd probably make the same business decision. But, as a fan? I find it frustrating they constantly rely on the past versus doing something new in the setting. What's next? A riff on Saved by the Bell, with Princess Leia and her friends in high school?
The budget will probably be ten times that of Fargo season 3, and they afforded him for ten eps just fine.I don't think the idea is for an ongoing series, but for a short miniseries, probably 6-8 episodes. (I'm guessing 6 rather than 8. McGregor's time doesn't come cheaply.)
A young Leia series would actually be an interesting premise. Political intrigue, espionage, philanthropy, fighting a fascistic regime and all aimed at a young teen demographic? Kind of Buffy meets Alias, with a little bit of The West Wing thrown in. Jimmy Smits & Keira Knightley shouldn't be too hard to get in supporting roles.I'd watch it.
And, here's the thing-audiences are demonstrating what they want with their money. Don't want more nostalgia? Got to go without Trek or Wars for a bit to demonstrate that level of interest. Until then, if it makes money, they will continue forward in the safest possible route.
Dude, you already hit Peak Bill when you compared it to Season 2 of Discovery based solely on the fact that they're both prequels, and we all know how you feel about Discovery.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.