• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Case dismissed! Discovery and Tardigrade game "not similar"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder now if any of the people making these click bait videos even watch the shows they trash.

But I am sure they have an excellent grasp on what sells to that crazed percentage of toxic fans who are happy to pay to be fed bullshit.
I have that thought every time I see a new one............Pick a popular show.....Pick the star or showrunner......make a video with a clickbait headline and use "un-named insider" source.......wait for the ad revenue!
 
I have that thought every time I see a new one............Pick a popular show.....Pick the star or showrunner......make a video with a clickbait headline and use "un-named insider" source.......wait for the ad revenue!
Don't forget to monitor the comments. Those "get woke, go broke" comments won't heart themselves!
 
Last edited:
From the video description:
For those who already know what is happening, feel free to ignore.
Actually ralfy, what I was asking for (and I think you know this) is for you to provide your own commentary about the contents of the videos you've been dropping around the board, so that you would have contributed something to the discussion yourself and have a position to defend instead of just lazily spamming the thread with someone else's shitty video and description. It's not about people on the receiving end having a lack of knowledge of the case, it's about discouraging posts by people who don't even want to put in the minimal amount of effort into their trolling drive-by threadshitting response.
 
Four more days and it will have been a year since this lawsuit was filed ...

Doesn't look any better for the Plaintiff now than it did 361 days ago.

:shrug:
 
What’s longer, this thread or the odds of him winning?
Actually, for him to 'win' - he'd have to provide some actual hard evidence (and not just make a circumstantial claim with no real evidence to back it up) <---- Which was what the Judge informed his counsel she'd need for the case to proceed further; and the date she gave for such evidence to be provided has come and gone -- and it's been passed by a BIG margin.

Thus, his chance of 'winning' at this point and time would be zero - unless he came across some real/major 'smoking gun' type evidence of course.
 
Thus, his chance of 'winning' at this point and time would be zero - unless he came across some real/major 'smoking gun' type evidence of course.
He's playing the long game my friend, you'll see. It'll turn out that everything after Enterprise was stolen from his game and as such will be cancelled, decanonised and burnt, and he and Alec Peters will get 1 trillion dollars each.
I haven't seen such cunning legal manoeuvring since I was in film school.
 
He's playing the long game my friend, you'll see. It'll turn out that everything after Enterprise was stolen from his game and as such will be cancelled, decanonised and burnt, and he and Alec Peters will get 1 trillion dollars each.
I haven't seen such cunning legal manoeuvring since I was in film school.

:rommie::rommie::rommie::rommie::rommie:
 
I'm wondering at this point if the Judge is actually giving the Plaintiffs Lawyer a chance to withdraw the suit.
Thus giving them an opportunity to not have a loss like this on their resume.
One would think that if the case had enough actual merit to go to jury, the Judge would have done so by now.

I know this Judge tends to procrastinate somewhat with making decisions, but I haven't found a case of her's that has dragged out this long, without any writs being entered into the court record by either side.
:shrug:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top