AAARRGGH!![]()
I think Harry Kim has been written as a covert gay character.
I think Harry Kim has been written as a covert gay character.
Quick aside: Back in the mid-90s I took a tour of the Coca-Cola Museum in Atlanta with my sister. I asked the tour guide when exactly it was that they stopped using cocaine in the formula. Not in an accusatory way, I was just curious as to when exactly it was that people wised up about that sort of thing. The tour guide said, with all the sincerely she could muster, "Oh, we never used cocaine in the original formula!"Opinion
Old Trek = Coca-Cola (with sugar cane)
NuTrek = New Coke
CBS Trek = Coca-Cola Classic (with fructose corn syrup)
I've tried Mexican Coke (which still uses sugar cane), and that's basically what Coke tasted like until 1985 from what I understand. And I do notice a difference. Corn Syrup is like the Visual Reboot.
"The Cage" is like Coca-Cola with cocaine, from 1886. The original original version.![]()
I think Harry Kim has been written as a covert gay character.
I don’t think so, some guys are just really shy and awkward with women.
Quick aside: Back in the mid-90s I took a tour of the Coca-Cola Museum in Atlanta with my sister. I asked the tour guide when exactly it was that they stopped using cocaine in the formula. Not in an accusatory way, I was just curious as to when exactly it was that people wised up about that sort of thing. The tour guide said, with all the sincerely she could muster, "Oh, we never used cocaine in the original formula!"Which I thought was a pretty funny way to address that question when it's brought up: Deny Deny Deny!!! I guess that was their official policy, because why open that can of worms?
![]()
Are you an English teacher?
![]()
If these are not symptoms of gayness then I don't know what is.
This makes zero sense. As @1001001 points out "gayness" is not a disease and doesn't have symptoms.If these are not symptoms of gayness then I don't know what is.
I never said that it was a disease. I never even suggested that."Gayness" does not have "symptoms". It is not a disease.
All of those scenes could be interpreted a different way.
....
If anything, I could make the argument that Harry is terrified of being in a long term committed relationship based upon those three episodes alone.
Calling it "symptoms" is often times synonymous with "disease."I never said that it was a disease. I never even suggested that.
It depends on the person and how they view relationships. Harry might view it as something outside of his control and therefore it creates fear. Lack of power and control in a relationship is certainly possible.Not the third one. Being kissed by a beautiful girl is not a stuff of nightmares, not to any straight (unengaged*) man at least.
*The precautions I must take in everything I say here are unbelievable!!!!
Calling it "symptoms" is often times synonymous with "disease."
....
...It depends on the person and how they view relationships. Harry might view it as something outside of his control and therefore it creates fear. Lack of power and control in a relationship is certainly possible.
"Often" is not the same as "always". Why don't you wait for me to call it a disease before you accuse me of calling it a disease?
We're having an informal discussion here, not writing essays or theses.
What if I had used "indication" instead of "symptom" what would have been your objection then, huh?
*The precautions I must take in everything I say here are unbelievable!!!!
The word does not have the connotation of disease and would be less objectionable. "Symptoms of gayness" is a poor way of phrasing it, at best. I'm not going to shy away from calling out poor phrasing just because of a possible defensive reaction.What if I had used "indication" instead of "symptom" what would have been your objection then, huh?
No, not really.So you don't find it weird that Harry's worst nightmare is being kissed by Seven?
Exactly.And I still say no, there was no indication Harry was gay. Being nervous around women is not the same as being sexually attracted to a man.
No, just a nitpicker. This one is particularly itchy.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.