It would be nice if that changed though. Yes, I used the "C" word. But, I like them being nobodies. 

I don’t see why? The characters have all been connected to one degree or another going all the way back to the beginning.
And Anakin built C-3PO. And Padme, then Anakin, owned R2.I don’t really see what other characters being connected has to do with anything. Also, only the skywalkers were actually related.
And Anakin built C-3PO. And Padme, then Anakin, owned R2.
Star Wars is full of small little connections binding all the main characters together in a very small universe some times.
Yeah, but the original plan at least seems to have been pretty fluid. Even so, I just find the idea that she somehow needs to be related to another character a little unnecessary. Almost diminishes her character a little.
How is that not how SW works? It's not like every Jedi needs to be a Skywalker or a Kenobi. I wouldn't be surprised if JJ goes for another virgin birth or ultra-Anakin style Jedi as a way to tie up the saga while also placating the fanbase, but I don't like the idea.
but the reaction on here to the suggestion they might be nobodies kinda proves my point.
Not that I’m a huge fan of Rey, but I think she’s probably the strongest sequels character, and that means she’s strong enough to stand by herself. She’s a plucky loner who was left alone since childhood and found that she was gifted with the force. I like that.
I just think the idea that she has to be related to another major character suggests her own character isn’t strong enough by itself. I don’t need a ‘oh, she’s the granddaughter of Qui Gon’ to complete her character, especially since they already did the connection between Kylo and Han/Leia. At this point, it feels kinda stale.
I don’t really see what other characters being connected has to do with anything. Also, only the skywalkers were actually related.
Have to wait and see how it plays out. Though I don’t think the original plan was for them to be nobodies.
Was Luke not strong enough? Anakin? Those are our leads in the other trilogies that make up the saga, and they are dependent on their familial relationships to really work in the story. We know who Anakin becomes etc because of how the prequels were made after the OT, it’s constantly informing the character, Luke becomes more heroic and more tragic and stronger because of his relation to Anakin/Vader from the moment Obi Wan fudges the truth to him in his hut.
how does she inherit the mantles of the heroes? I am happy for her to do so, in so far as I like her, but there really needs to be a reason in context of the story other than coincidence and everyone feeling sorry for her.
Honestly, he’s just got a better sense of what the fanbase wants.
I guess we’ll have to disagree on The necessity of explaining Rey’s parentage, but the reaction on here to the suggestion they might be nobodies kinda proves my point.
Well, we already knew who Anakin was, and we didn't get any new relations in the prequel trilogy. Not sure I'd cite him as a strong character, but there we go.
As for Luke, sure, it made his character more interesting, but I think Luke was more thematically focused on his father. Mostly though, I just think we've done all this before. Okay, there was a twist where we learned Luke and Vader are related. It was excellent. We also had the Leia thing, but that was mostly just wrapping things up. Just feels stale to say that Rey must be the daughter of someone important.
We'll just have to disagee on that. Coincidence is fine. Anything else feels a little contrived.
And you would be wrong (provided those "nobodies" don't turn out to be Skywalkers from Shmi's paternal line).
As has been stated several times, both JJ and Rian have separately confirmed that they both independently reached the same conclusion about Rey's parentage.
Daisy was saying after TFA came out that she thought it was obvious who Rey's parents were.
Han and Leia. That’s why what Kylo was telling her was true...from a certain point of view.
She is Janina 2.0
Personally...it smells like a marketing band aid over differing viewpoints. .
Yes, but conspiracy theories are far more, don't ya know?That's a massive conspiracy theory and is patently silly.
No.
So two people - JJ and Rian - are going to have consistently stated that they both independently reached the same conclusion regarding the identities of Rey's parents as some sort of "smokescreen" to hide BtS disagreements?
That's a massive conspiracy theory and is patently silly.
Rian Johnson did not come in and ignore or contradict anything that Abrams set up for him with The Force Awakens. That is the indisputable truth as supported by the actions and statements of both men directly and of other individuals directly associated with both TFA and TLJ.
Not everything people say is the truth, especially when it comes to money.So two people - JJ and Rian - are going to have consistently stated that they both independently reached the same conclusion regarding the identities of Rey's parents as some sort of "smokescreen" to hide BtS disagreements?
That's a massive conspiracy theory and is patently silly.
Rian Johnson did not come in and ignore or contradict anything that Abrams set up for him with The Force Awakens. That is the indisputable truth as supported by the actions and statements of both men directly and of other individuals directly associated with both TFA and TLJ.
It's a distinct impression the fan base ran with. That doesn't make it a foregone conclusion just because the fan base believes it so.Let’s just say...TFA gave a distinct impression that leads me to doubt that all.
Not everyone is a liar either. I'd rather not go through my life thinking people are lying to me on a constant basis. Already lived 10 years of that life.Not everything people say is the truth, especially when it comes to money.
Don't believe everything you read/hear.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.