I am going to award you the "Just Shut Up" award for today. Someone once said that there is no such thing as a stupid question. I believe you have proven him to be in error.Too bad this isn't the things that frustrate thread because as far as I am concerned the last exchange certainly qualifies.
Stop making sense, Kor.The chances of being killed by a falling tree: https://naturenet.net/blogs/2007/02/19/killed-by-a-falling-tree-what-are-the-chances/
I don't remember much from college stats, but it seemed that the way the question was framed had a big part in determining whether you could get a number that actually means anything.
Kor
When I was an engineer back in the dark ages, we had a fellow on our staff named Vorel who was a little weak in his math skills and we invented a term called Vorel's Fudge Factor which can be defined as that number which, when added to, subtracted from, multiplied by or divided by the answer you got gives you the answer you should have gotten.The chances of being killed by a falling tree: https://naturenet.net/blogs/2007/02/19/killed-by-a-falling-tree-what-are-the-chances/
I don't remember much from college stats, but it seemed that the way the question was framed had a big part in determining whether you could get a number that actually means anything.
Kor
When I was an engineer back in the dark ages, we had a fellow on our staff named Vorel who was a little weak in his math skills and we invented a term called Vorel's Fudge Factor which can be defined as that number which, when added to, subtracted from, multiplied by or divided by the answer you got gives you the answer you should have gotten.
Put simply your chances of being hit by the tree in your silly scenario are exctly zero. It takes much longer than a second for a tree to fall. Even someone stupid enough to stand under a tree for 1 sec./day should escape unscathed. Got any more silly questions?
What's not reasonable is to start a conversation about Math with people who don't know the first thing about it. Lesson learned.
Your conversation about "math" was not recognizable as such by a person whose work required the use of mathematics every day for 40 years.What's not reasonable is to start a conversation about Math with people who don't know the first thing about it. Lesson learned.
Your conversation about "math" was not recognizable as such by a person whose work required the use of mathematics every day for 40 years.
Excuse me? More salt on their fries? Will someone please translate? I'm not sure what this has to do with the price of tea in China.Yeah, it was back when people asked you for more salt on their fries.
Excuse me? More salt on their fries? Will someone please translate? I'm not sure what this has to do with the price of tea in China.
Let me ask you - If Jack helped you off a horse would you help Jack off a horse?Really? You need someone's help to get that? Wow!!
Let me ask you - If Jack helped you off a horse would you help Jack off a horse?
Well, would you?Looks like you need to see a man about a horse, badly!!!
As you would say, it's a simple question - this one requiring zero mathematical acumen. A simple yes or no was all that was required. Apparently it was beyond the scope of your comprehension.You a little slow, aren't you?![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.