I would probably lock myself in the holodeck and never leave. It may not be real but it'd be real enough for me.
I know. So what's your point?
I would use the holodeck for absolutely everything. When I read a book, I’d do it at the pond beneath the willow on Tampit Lane, in 1890. When I cook, I’d cook in an enormous parlour stuffed full of every imaginable food. Roast Dodo, why not, or maybe pteranodon in orange sauce. When I bathed, I’d do it in a Roman bath with lots of naked women. When I learned, anything, I’d learn from the best, or at least a decent approximation of them.
I can’t boil an egg without checking the forums while I do it, the holodeck would soon become intertwined with my existence.
Or they'd disappear out of each other's view, and begin experiencing their own segment of the program. IIRC, that's kind of what happened in Emergence, when Data splits off from Troi & Worf, who follow the Gangster, leaving Data to fend off the taxi. They went down whole streets and around corners away from him, certainly a larger area than the holodeck room is, I'd think.A little off topic, but if two people were on the holodeck and walked in different directions?
Would they eventually run into the walls?
Back on Topic... sort of... Isn't there anyone who'd be more interested in using the holodeck for learning shit? You could literally teach yourself how to do surgery, on human subjects, without jeopardizing people, become a pilot, an architect, engineer. It's no wonder Trek's universe is filled with people so much more skilled than us. They have an inexhaustible source of practical study. I'd think the academy ought to be like 80% holodeck training
You'd be learning how to become a pilot and then the holodeck safeguards would fail...
They would just have a "_______ compensator" which solves that issue with some inexplicable technobabble.If holodecks existed for real, they'd be very different from what is shown in ST. The so-called forcefield, for example, couldn't be electromagnetic in nature as prolonged exposure to it demonstrably causes cancers. In fact, it would take longer to solve all the cases of diseases caused by the holodecks than to invent the holodecks in the first place.
electromagnetic in nature as prolonged exposure to it demonstrably causes cancers.
?????
The holodeck wouldn't use ultraviolet or higher frequency EM radiation to begin with. Anything with longer wavelength (visible light on down to extremely long wavelength radio) can't cause cancer, no matter how intense the source, because the individual photons don't have enough energy to break the chemical bonds in DNA.
....
I'm having a very Paul Stamets moment here. Imagine him speaking now.You're wrong, it's not the photons that cause cancer, it's the induced currents, plus the Joule effect caused by those currents moving through cells, cause the cells to heat up and either die (internal burns) or degrade and become cancerous. It has nothing to do with photons. basically, it's like having a microwave oven inside of your body.
I'm having a very Paul Stamets moment here. Imagine him speaking now.
That's not only wrong, it's completely wrong. All you're going to get from that is being cooked--the cells are going to die entirely. If a cell is dead, it can't grow. If it can't grow, it can't become malignant. If it can't become malignant, it can't lead to cancer.
I would use the holodeck for training, exercise, sports, and for testing suggestions and plans. Not for hound-dog activities.On the USS Enterprise and USS Voyager we saw the Holodeck as a sophisticated suite that utilized holographic projections, photons and forefields to simulate apparently almost anything.
1. What would you use the holodeck for?
2. Could it be used for sexual purposes/orgies?
It seemed that it could be used for recreation, official business, parties and research simulations.
We saw Riker suggest (2) in TNG: The Perfect Mate. Frankly, I'm surprised that anyone having just visited Counsellor Troi, didn't immediately go to the holodeck afterward to meet her again!
Thoughts? Would you use it to make out with your crush? The possibilities seem endless! Was this encouraged on starships?
BTW: There's at least one thing about which Stamets is dead wrong and that's the validity of spore drive, let alone its superiority to regular warp drive. There must be something fundamentally wrong about spore drive otherwise Picard, Sisko, Janeway et al; would all use it. At some point in the future of Disco, the federation must have realized that spore drive is impractical, maybe it causes large scale irreversible damage, maybe the people who use it die young...
Perhaps there's nothing inherently wrong with it, but it's banned for another reason (such as the Feds not using cloaking technology).
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.