Spoilers The future isn’t set (and that has implications)

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by NewHeavensNewEarth, Apr 19, 2019.

  1. eschaton

    eschaton Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2017
    Technically speaking, just because the Discovery crew go forward in time, do something heroic, then return to their own time doesn't mean that their earlier actions have to be erased. Instead it might be the case that Discovery was always "destined" to make that jaunt and return - that the "proper" timeline involved a closed loop.
     
    SolarisOne, Gonzo and Mr. Laser Beam like this.
  2. Lord Garth

    Lord Garth Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
    Location:
    In a spoof of '50s sci-fi movies
    It sure felt that way.
     
    SolarisOne likes this.
  3. Norsehound

    Norsehound Captain Captain

    Joined:
    May 21, 2013
    Location:
    Camel, IN
    I don't think the writers are going to have much more freedom than they do now. People will wonder where the Temporal Investigations group went or all of those other far-future events described in places like TNG. In the least, they may be upset with the state of the Federation if it gets to that (where's the Time police to make sure the Federation is stable?).

    I would have rather them given us the tales and adventures of one of Enterprises' contemporaries than define an entirely new era of Star Trek. Kirk's ship doesn't have to be the only one famous in that period. Doesn't matter now though, I guess, if this is what the fans wanted.
     
  4. The Lensman

    The Lensman Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2001
    Location:
    The Lensman
    Warp capable ship + sun = time travel.
     
    Ar-Pharazon likes this.
  5. Turd Ferguson

    Turd Ferguson Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2003
    Location:
    Kentucky
    If they were to come back, though, it would make Pike, Number One, Spock, Tyler and the rest of the Enterprise crew look like lying schmucks.
     
  6. F. King Daniel

    F. King Daniel Fleet Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2008
    Location:
    A type 13 planet in it's final stage
    I would agree if they hadn't just done a Section 31 storyline, where they were essentially the SS of Starfleet operating openly under select Starfleet admirals.
     
  7. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
    I didn't, so tell Ensign Strawman he's relieved.
     
    SolarisOne likes this.
  8. starbuck

    starbuck Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2001
    Location:
    Scotland
    i bet the sphere data helps them cope in that time line
     
  9. Agony_Boothb

    Agony_Boothb Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    That stuff is all pretty easy to retcon or plain ignore. Also, as was pointed out to me when I started clutching my pearls about this very issue a couple of weeks ago: The time cops were a dumb idea and are best ignored.

    The future is constantly in flux, it can be erased or created with a line of dialogue.
     
  10. JayTheTrekkie

    JayTheTrekkie Fleet Captain Fleet Captain

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Location:
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    I was thinking about that the last couple days. I was thinking the crew will likely stay there for a season or two to do some exploring and some fixing and then somehow get home on a ship (perhaps a freighter that would hold 130 something crew) but leave the Discovery behind because of the data.

    I wonder what Starfleet reaction will be when they get home (without the Discovery itself that is).
     
  11. Alan Roi

    Alan Roi Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2019
    And who knows where and when they make it back.
     
  12. NewHeavensNewEarth

    NewHeavensNewEarth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    Location:
    NewHeavensNewEarth
    Overall, if there's a consensus to be found, it's that Discovery probably won't return to its spot in the TOS era, but if it does, it's fine to change/reset the future as long as it doesn't change TNG, DS9, etc. ;)

    But I think we'll need 2 DSC forums now!
     
    Last edited: Apr 20, 2019
    SolarisOne likes this.
  13. SeamusShameless

    SeamusShameless Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Location:
    Beyond The Farthest Star
    I'm curious about the status of Gabrielle Burnham. Considering she was tethered to Terralysium in a future where Control won, Discovery likely won't end up in the same place since they jumped to the future after Control was neutralized. I wonder then whether Dr. Burnham will somehow end up being in the new future where Control lost or if Michael will have to deal with the fact that she can't keep her promise to find her mother again.
     
    Galaxy likes this.
  14. arch101

    arch101 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    May 3, 1999
    Location:
    Quincy, MA
    Enterprise proved how difficult a Trek prequel is to manage. 24 series of 23rd-24th century Trek just leaves too much canon to navigate around. I've always thought (and posted on Trek BBS more than once) that the next series needs to move way, way into the future to be free of all this. Like, hundreds or a thousand years into the future. Well, looks like I got my wish. Fortunately, anything we've seen beyond the 24th century has been sparing and of little detail. I don't think these writers will have any difficulties with all that. Excited to see what they do come up with.
     
    Unimatrix Q and urbandk like this.
  15. Gonzo

    Gonzo Guest

    That would be the case if they were going home but it looks like they never will.

    As for the changes all they have to do to guarantee that there is no reset is to make sure that the probe is sent back to attack Pike/Tylers shuttle, that is the only event that we have not seen the cause of yet and we know it came from the future.

    Without it they can activate a reset whenever they want or just ignore it completely.

    It makes sense that it could be some part of Control that wasnt quite as neutralised as they thought and as we know Leland was on the Discovery when it jumped, the AI could have set all kinds of backup plans into motion before it engaged the Discovery and Enterprise.

    I would have done and it had already secured 50% of the data.
     
  16. Gonzo

    Gonzo Guest

    Yes, time loops aside there is still the potential for predestination.

    We saw an example of that when Burnham was trying to create the wormhole but couldnt because other actions needed to be performed first.
     
    serabine likes this.
  17. NewHeavensNewEarth

    NewHeavensNewEarth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    Location:
    NewHeavensNewEarth
    These are the temporal headaches that every ST fan gets in any series.
     
  18. SeamusShameless

    SeamusShameless Captain Captain

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2007
    Location:
    Beyond The Farthest Star
    I hear ya! 18 years on, and I'm still not entirely sure Enterprise isn't the result of a divergent timeline created by the events of First Contact.
     
  19. BillJ

    BillJ The King of Kings Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2001
    Location:
    America, Fuck Yeah!!!
    I am. It and Discovery.
     
  20. NewHeavensNewEarth

    NewHeavensNewEarth Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2019
    Location:
    NewHeavensNewEarth
    Gotta ask the Time Cops if there's Temporal Tylenol. :lol: