• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Constitution Class Refit (High Resolution model)

Sure enough! I zoomed in real close and saw what I thought was missing. My apologies for not giving it a closer look.

With regard to the grilles, I guess I'm more used to the (possibly incorrect) version of the nacelles that show a more pronounced and flatter detailing on the inboard side. Kind of like this:
View attachment 9038
Hmm. I dunno if that flatness is accurate. There's definitely a curve towards the forward end, although I could see how someone does think it's flat because it does appear to flatten out towards the aft end from some angles.

However, I would say the slits of the inner nacelle grille do appear they need to be wider on Viper's model, unless he was purposefully departing from the studio model
 
Last edited:
Hmm. I dunno if that flatness is accurate. There's definitely a curve towards the forward end, although I could see how someone does think it's flat because it does appear to flatten out towards the aft end from some angles.

However, I would say the slits of the inner nacelle grille do appear they need to be wider on Viper's model, unless he was purposefully departing from the studio model

It's definitely curved all the way. And yeah, I think you are right about the spacing. I'll add that to the list of corrections :)
 
Meanwhile, got through most of the decals tonight:
constitution183.jpg

constitution184.jpg

constitution185.jpg
 
This is a nitpick and something I ran into myself with my interior sets, but the font you're using for the non-outlined text looks a little too "thin". What font are you using? Are you using the outlined registry font (Starfleet Bold Extended) but just subtracting the outline? If so that could explain why it looks a little thin. I'd tried the same thing with my corridor set decals and abandoned this method once I realized it didn't look right.



The font used on the filming model for the non-outlined font was Eurostile Bold Extended, but with an adjusted "1" to match Starfleet Bold Extended.
 
Last edited:
This is a nitpick and something I ran into myself with my interior sets, but the font you're using for the non-outlined text looks a little too "thin". What font are you using? Are you using the outlined registry font (Starfleet Bold Extended) but just subtracting the outline? If so that could explain why it looks a little thin. I'd tried the same thing with my corridor set decals and abandoned this method once I realized it didn't look right.



The font used on the filming model for the non-outlined font was Eurostile Bold, but with an adjusted "1" to match Starfleet Bold Extended.

Yeah, I can see the issue. I'm using the Jefferies font that does not have the outline built in, so it's much easier to work with. It also doesn't have the round curves on the edges of the letters. You can see in the second picture you posted that the number 7 only has a curve on the inner angle. All other angles are straight.

I'll see if I can apply a style in Photoshop to get the fonts a bit thicker. I don't think the font you mentioned works though. The C's look much taller than the Jefferies font.
 
I don't think the font you mentioned works though. The C's look much taller than the Jefferies font.

Sure about that? Obviously the "1" and hypens need to be adjusted, but looks like a match to me.
 
Sure about that? Obviously the "1" and hypens need to be adjusted, but looks like a match to me.

:brickwall: That's completely different from the previews on Adobe's website. I'll check it out in Photoshop later.

Also, quick tip, instead of typing -, try Alt + 0150: –
 
Sorry, I meant to say Eurostile Bold Extended. I’ve corrected my post above as well.
:brickwall: That's completely different from the previews on Adobe's website. I'll check it out in Photoshop later.

Also, quick tip, instead of typing -, try Alt + 0150: –
 
Just spent a couple of hours modelling some proper docking ports. I was never happy with what I had before, which is why there were always holes on one side of the ship. It's missing a few minor details, but I was anxious to see how it fit :)

constitution188.jpg

constitution187.jpg

constitution189.jpg

constitution190.jpg
 
@Viper - Wow your Enterprise looks beautiful. Is one of your alterations the addition of the Enterprise name to the side of the torpedo launcher?
 
@Viper - Wow your Enterprise looks beautiful. Is one of your alterations the addition of the Enterprise name to the side of the torpedo launcher?

Thanks! It is, but I didn't come up with that per say. The closeup model for the damage scenes in TWOK and TSFS has that detail:
constitution_20091030_1998218272.jpg


I also took a few other changes from that model that I liked. Easy to spot if you compare :)
 
I still have a few things to do on the ship to be able to call the exterior done, but I couldn't resist trying my hand at a more finished render. Low resolution for now as it's just a test. Eventually I'll render some 8k versions. For now, let me know if you think this is a good style and look.

space01.jpg
 
Looks fantastic! My only critique would be, and this may just be personal taste, but the green of the deflector/strongback/etc looks a little too high in saturation. On the other hand, I think mine might be a little too grey. Otherwise, it’s freaking perfect.
I still have a few things to do on the ship to be able to call the exterior done, but I couldn't resist trying my hand at a more finished render. Low resolution for now as it's just a test. Eventually I'll render some 8k versions. For now, let me know if you think this is a good style and look.

space01.jpg
 
If I didn't know better... if I hadn't been watching you put this together... I'd swear that was a photo of the actual model. It looks solid. :adore::drool::eek:

Goal achieved then! Thanks for the kind words :beer:

Looks fantastic! My only critique would be, and this may just be personal taste, but the green of the deflector/strongback/etc looks a little too high in saturation. On the other hand, I think mine might be a little too grey. Otherwise, it’s freaking perfect.

Thanks! It's a fine balance I think. I like the idea of having the green standout to break the white of the ship a bit. I can try desaturating it just a bit. On the other hand, it's possible the problem here was the post processing.
 
This thing is absolutely beautiful. Even those earlier pre texture renders look like such the idealized Enterprise in my eye. It really makes me want to fire up Blender and build one myself.

Technical question however, and its something I've always wondered. I'm on the compositing side of VFX and have done enough modeling to know my way around a 3d program, but I have always been curious...how did you do your panel lines? It seems like such a simple thing, but whenever I see a 3d model with beautiful fine panel lines, I can't figure out where in the process they are created. I feel like they are probably too much of a pain to be modeled into the mesh (though I could be wrong), since they would be so hard to edit, but they are there before you did your UVing, so they aren't a baked in texture map. Is it a separate process you are performing after you building the base mesh? They seem too fine and precise to be a bump or displacement map that you had as part of your texturing work flow, which is honestly how I would have approached the problem, but with a model that is built to withstand such scrutiny as this one, that would fall apart at really close distances.

Any insights would very much be appreciated. And again, just beautiful work.
 
This thing is absolutely beautiful. Even those earlier pre texture renders look like such the idealized Enterprise in my eye. It really makes me want to fire up Blender and build one myself.

Technical question however, and its something I've always wondered. I'm on the compositing side of VFX and have done enough modeling to know my way around a 3d program, but I have always been curious...how did you do your panel lines? It seems like such a simple thing, but whenever I see a 3d model with beautiful fine panel lines, I can't figure out where in the process they are created. I feel like they are probably too much of a pain to be modeled into the mesh (though I could be wrong), since they would be so hard to edit, but they are there before you did your UVing, so they aren't a baked in texture map. Is it a separate process you are performing after you building the base mesh? They seem too fine and precise to be a bump or displacement map that you had as part of your texturing work flow, which is honestly how I would have approached the problem, but with a model that is built to withstand such scrutiny as this one, that would fall apart at really close distances.

Any insights would very much be appreciated. And again, just beautiful work.

Thanks very much :) The panel lines are an interesting subject. I started to work on this ship a year ago, and hit a wall when it came to the panels. I didn't want to boolean them in as that's all sorts of nightmares. On the other hand, if you do it via textures, you loose a lot in terms of resolution and definition as you said. So the project got shelved for quite a while until this year. I decided to re do it, but I still didn't know how to approach it. The solution came from taking a look at Blender. It has a tool called shrinkwrap. With it, I can make each individual panel in a 2d plane and wrap it to a base mesh. The other thing is that my panels are actual panels. They are separated completely and they have a thickness instead of doing a small dip. It creates other problems of course, but I the results are much better. For my goal, which is to have a VFX ready model, it was also a better workflow. It means I can do things like exposing the interior or damage much easier than if I had an airtight model.

Let me know if you have more questions. Happy to help :)
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top