Or he was just using the necessary words to force Riker to stop focusing on what was not the priority at the moment. At best, Picard's status is a POW, which they can do nothing about until they have the upper hand. At worst he's dead, which they can't even determine, let alone do anything about, until they have the upper hand. Jellico is focusing on getting the upper hand, because that's the play. Riker is falling right into the pitfalls they have laid out for them, because he's a dupe. We're talking about a guy who's pecker nearly got the whole ship taken over by jerkwads with an addictive candy crush game. Riker needed to be told to back off on the Picard issue, & the best way to make him hear it was to slam the door on itHe was ready to declare Picard dead at the beginning of the episode,
It's out of character for any right minded Starfleet officer, which he does nothing but prove he is. People want to overlook that Jellico is a Starfleet line officer in top standing. He is ONE of them. In all likelihood, he would be VERY much like all the others. Leaving a fellow officer to burn, when you can do something about it, goes against everything they stand for. Hell, it's not even sound logic for keeping a strong fleet, if you just abandon one of the fleet's best officer's once you have the upper hand you've been jockeying for.I don't think it would be out of character for him to focus on protecting the planets and write him off completely
Remember that when Riker talked to Kurn about that the latter had to stop himself from killing him!
You know I never thought about that.The other thing people overlook about Jellico in their default zeal to defend our regular cast, is the narrative in which he's presented. He was not presented like any other Starfleet Officer prior. In almost all cases for Star Trek, especially on TNG, any opposing Starfleet officer, who's actions might be wrongful, questionable, or corrupt, those characters are brought to some kind of justice in the narrative. Whether they are arrested like Pressman or Maxwell, die like Jameson or Dougherty, get stripped of their authority, like Norah Satie, are proved wrong like Dr. Toby Russel, OR find enlightenment, like Haftel & Maddox, the narrative displays them for their wrongness.
In Jellico's case, while he does have to make an insignificant amends & accept he might need Riker for a part of his mission, he isn't shown to be wrong about removing him as XO. He isn't proved wrong in any way whatsoever, beyond Riker proclaiming that he's not fun to work for, as ridiculous as that sounds in a time of potential war. Jellico doesn't get any tangible comeuppance, because he doesn't really deserve any. He was sent there to do a job & he did it, & it worked
The narrative presents him on equal footing with our regulars, & that means we ought to objectively view the scenario as if it were Picard & Riker having this dispute, or some other 2nd in command, who we don't know, & who's side would we all fall on if that were the case? You'd side with Picard, because Riker is the one being wrongful, whether he's personally satisfied with his captain or not
Right in a way it’s rigged. Hmm I thought Star Trek was above that. LolI don't like it when the deck is stacked against a character that no matter what he does we're supposed to find his actions wrong. I sort of feel like that's how we were expected to judge Jellico.
He isn't proved wrong in any way whatsoever, beyond Riker proclaiming that he's not fun to work for, as ridiculous as that sounds in a time of potential war. Jellico doesn't get any tangible comeuppance, because he doesn't really deserve any.
Riker needed to be told to back off on the Picard issue, & the best way to make him hear it was to slam the door on it
Riker's last jab and the fact that he ultimately needed to work with him is the comeuppance the narrative was expressing
Because they certainly wouldn't want you to think Riker is as worthless as he was presently being. That scene is hardly comeuppance for Jellico. It's much more redemption for Riker, who otherwise was sitting on his pimply white butt, doing nothing, while Picard's life hangs in the balance, & he's literally out there being torturedWhy else would the writers choose to have him be the pilot Jellico needed?
So if Riker had been less of a moron, who needs every superior's directive justified & explained... In other words a babysitter, then things would've been great? Should he have to explain to Troi how to put on her standard uniform too, or can she just figure that out on her own without causing a shipwide rebellion?If Jellico had said he intended to gain an advantage and then use it to bargain for Picard like he actually ended up doing, there would have been no conflict.
By the time Riker was confined to quarters he'd already shown that he lacked the interest and/or ability to be a good resource for what Jellico needed him to be to that point in time: an XO who would facilitate, rather than complicate, relations between the captain and the crew.
Riker's last jab and the fact that he ultimately needed to work with him is the comeuppance the narrative was expressing and it's not meant to be brushed off like it's being here. Maybe the guy who gets offered ships repeatedly knows a thing or two about when a new captain is not working well with the crew.
Because he's one of the 7 main characters of the show and the second most senior officer of the ship. (Remeber Geordi said he could do it too; but that Riker was the best pilot on the ship.)Why else would the writers choose to have him be the pilot Jellico needed? They needed a way to tell the audience, yeah he actually needed to work with the guy he just discarded in order to accomplish he mission.
The problem is: The crew WAS whining (Especially Geordi when he asked Riker to get Picard to intercede. But I'll give theRiker character this: At least once he saw what Picard was going through; he was at least smart enpough to realize it would be stupid totry and saddle Picard with his and Geordi's issues.)The best way was to realize Riker needed to hear there was an avenue of action to help Picard. If Jellico had said he intended to gain an advantage and then use it to bargain for Picard like he actually ended up doing, there would have been no conflict. He spends more effort on the shift rotations and getting the fish out of his ready room than getting them past the loss of the captain and confident in him. He had weakness in that area as a captain which the writers pointed out through Troi and Riker.
I think the message of the episode is lost if we conclude Riker & crew were just whining Jellico was a badass and leave it at that.... Even if one looks at it and says the crew acted poorly from a rank/duty perspective, there is still something there to be said about Jellico.
Picard should have been a non-issue from the start and Riker should have realized Jellico WAS CORRECT in not giving the Cardassians a political bargaining chip that would cost the Federation colonies OR lead to an all out war, just for one man who KNEW it was a suicide mission. (A team od 3, and maps that were two years old...yeah, the Federation really expects Picard to come back. No. They expected him to take out the weapon. Survival was secondary.)I'd say if they got over the Picard issue then Riker & Jellico would have worked well together and that would be a stronger team than the resulting one where he fires Riker in front of Troi. The guy can work with Shelby and a Klingon crew I'm pretty certain he would have adapted to Jellico's style. Frankly Riker's style isn't far off when you look at how he deals with Barclay and Geordi
Barclay was late to shifts and not doing his job worse than Riker, Jellico would take one look at that and blow him out the airlock
True, but compared to what the 1701-clique did:Barclay was late to shifts and not doing his job worse than Riker, Jellico would take one look at that and blow him out the airlock
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.