• Welcome! The TrekBBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans.
    If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Why Does The Universe Exist?

From another post.

https://news.stanford.edu/2017/05/25/high-pressure-key-lighter-stronger-metal-alloys/
Very good article regarding the use of pressure to compress alloys together.
One interesting section.
Stable configuration
Interestingly, the alloy retains an HCP structure even after the pressure is removed. “Most of the time, when you take the pressure away, the atoms snap back to their previous configuration.
"Jackson"
If a black hole functions in much the same way, an extreme amount of pressure is present that compresses atoms together so tightly that space time itself is created at the speed of the Universe, then when even the slightest amount of pressure is taken away the atoms snap back to their previous configuration. Snapping back into their previous configuration causing an immense amount of energy to be released in a possible Big Bang in another part of the Universe that is outside of our Universe.
I would also have to theorize that the DNA of life would be shared between galaxies and Universes in the same way that atoms share electrons between each other.
Atoms share electrons. It's a give and take affair. Wouldn't the Multi-verse function in the same way where the black hole would take electrons from our Universe and give them to another Universe like our Universe was given?
"Do unto them (or give them electrons) as they would do (or give them electrons) unto you"
A wormhole is merely nothing more than a black hole where the electrons of atoms are exchanging so rapidly that space time has been pulled closer to each other from different regions of space. The only difference is that the electrons are not snapping back to their original configuration as fast as they would inside of a black hole creating a Big Bang.
If you look at your ancient religious texts for phrases such as "Do unto them as you would have do unto too you." that imparts a sense of electrons being transferred back and forth, the ancients encoded the secrets of the Universe too create a Bucky Beaver Ground Grappler Faster than Light starship engine....or at least how to go really fast with new non-electron transferring metals and alloys.
I smacked Eve's a** and she liked it.
 
Last edited:
I know.

As for the rest.. they've been using explosion welding to bond stainless steel to the hull plates of icebreakers for years already
 
But isn't that the reason that we exist? We made our own existence come to be because we wanted too?
If the substrate of the multiverse operates on quantum computer principles and space time in each 'verse is of Minkowskian block form, perhaps there is a way for some 'verses to be able to retrospectively program themselves and other 'verses. That doesn't mean that the 'verse in which you happen to find yourself will have that capability.

Gibber...I almost believed that.
 
It's surprisingly difficult to write gibberish that looks like it might be meaningful if only you were more familiar with the subject area. The art of doing so isn't well practiced around here, where the gibberish is more obvious.

It all depends on the level of education of the people you are trying to deceive. Completely opaque gibberish is usually exactly what it looks like. Anything with a real meaning as a borderline understandability that is easy to detect. Like when you're French and hear people speak Spanish or Italian, you get the feeling that it would take very little for what you hear to make sense.
 
It's surprisingly difficult to write gibberish that looks like it might be meaningful if only you were more familiar with the subject area. The art of doing so isn't well practiced around here, where the gibberish is more obvious.

Maybe one persons gibber is anothers rish
www.technologyreview.com/s/613092/a-quantum-experiment-suggests-theres-no-such-thing-as-objective-reality/

Still, I fall off a tower---I still go splat, whether I think I do or not.

Your idea of "block form" you mentioned in the word salad above--actually makes sense. We bulky objects are an amalgam of possibilities. The smaller you get...the more options you have, it seems.
 
Maybe one persons gibber is anothers rish
www.technologyreview.com/s/613092/a-quantum-experiment-suggests-theres-no-such-thing-as-objective-reality/

Still, I fall off a tower---I still go splat, whether I think I do or not.
The Frauchiger-Renner paradox? Seems maybe either our interpretation of QM is wrong or the multiverse/universe really is screwy. Or maybe not...

Also, no splat if the "angels" save your ass:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Well we know the minimum length and time must be at the Planck scale -- 1.6 x 10^-35 m and 10^-43 s. Talking about geometric objects at those scales is fanciful because they could not be constructed of any material substance and the Heisenberg uncertainty principle would prevent the precise delimitation of any line, area, volume, or clock tick without consequent huge uncertainties in momentum and energy. It amuses me when people theorise about space-time being made of fundamental geometrical objects like so many Lego blocks. It's a terrible anthropomorphic failure of imagination.
 
If you are not already a member then please register an account and join in the discussion!

Sign up / Register


Back
Top