Why bring up the novels?In the novels they say that there was no front during the time of the Federation as they all thought it would be too dangerous to tamper during that time. That was only because of Star Trek Destiny though.
Why bring up the novels?In the novels they say that there was no front during the time of the Federation as they all thought it would be too dangerous to tamper during that time. That was only because of Star Trek Destiny though.
fixed point in time, got it.In the novels they say that there was no front during the time of the Federation as they all thought it would be too dangerous to tamper during that time. That was only because of Star Trek Destiny though.
While that does have some similarities, this is much closer to the design ethic that we are seeing...
![]()
But really, this design is even closer....
![]()
So it must be the Russians!
![]()
Carolina Reapers have a bit of resemblance....
![]()
Slingshot maneuver is from "Tomorrow is Yesterday", they never used the cold intermix means of time travel again. (Although there was a fanon "time ship" from the 80s that did.)In Naked Time they found a very easy way to time travel with the slingshot maneuvre, which was competely new and could be done again and again. (and, in fact, was done again a couple of decades later to save some whales) That's very different to time travel as presented in DSC that needed the involvement of Red Angels and Tachyon particles and space anomalia
It doesn't have to be a continuation of TCW. It would just be what happened in the 23rd century as part of the same TCW.
We only saw the 22nd century (and other) incursions/results Archer and co. witnessed.
Well, who says his is the only faction?Canonically, Future Guy's faction couldn't travel backwards in time - only send messages backwards. So even if the probe went into the future at roughly the same time period, it couldn't be as a result of Future Guy's faction, but some other player.
Well, who says his is the only faction?
The TCW...yeah...let’s return to a barely thought through plot device from a Star Trek series that barely anyone watched and was the first ST show to be cancelled. That’s a great way to tell a story.
Nope.
The TCW...yeah...let’s return to a barely thought through plot device from a Star Trek series that barely anyone watched and was the first ST show to be cancelled. That’s a great way to tell a story.
the Suliban were the Kazon of ENT. but there were good time travel episodes for ENTThe TCW...yeah...let’s return to a barely thought through plot device from a Star Trek series that barely anyone watched and was the first ST show to be cancelled. That’s a great way to tell a story.
TOS wasn't cancelled?The TCW...yeah...let’s return to a barely thought through plot device from a Star Trek series that barely anyone watched and was the first ST show to be cancelled. That’s a great way to tell a story.
TOS wasn't cancelled?
I'm both a Trekkie and an editor. Expect unusual levels of pedantry.Ah, I see my error. Let me rephrase: ENT was the first Star Trek show to be cancelled since TOS. Better?![]()
Can't there be new drama/new storytelling using Talosians? I mean, other Star Trek series had reused aliens on multiple occasions and still told new stories with those "repeating" aliens. Why wouldn't DIS be able to tell a generally new story using Talosians?I'm with you. They're basically leaning on 50-year old storylines to artificially create tension/expectation rather than develop new plots. But ultimately that undermines the intent b/c half the viewers are focused on "whoa, we saw the Talosians in the Cage! How will this story fit in?!" rather than on your new drama.
Can't there be new drama/new storytelling using Talosians? I mean, other Star Trek series had reused aliens on multiple occasions and still told new stories with those "repeating" aliens. Why wouldn't DIS be able to tell a generally new story using Talosians?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.