It is very disturbing to me the insistence upon malining a show that is not enjoyable rather than moving on and appreciating the shows that are enjoyable.
Breakdown of Midnight's Edge Roundtable About Alex Kurtzman
- Thread starter Qonundrum
- Start date
....could he?
I wouldn’t call them fans. Fans tend to want more not less. It’s a great thing for miserable assholes.
It isn’t healthy to constantly focus on things you hate. I find the very idea of hating something so much that you want it to go away instead of finding something else to focus on disgusting. It’s like they’re addicted to hate.
You might be on to something.
The common justification offered by those espousing such views is that if the Trek they like fails, it will be replaced by Real Trek, since that is What the Fans Want. Alternatively, it stops such instalments from Tarnishing the Star Trek Name.
The perceived change of direction for Discovery in s2 has emboldened advocates of the former view, asserting that their reaction is responsible.
I've not been able to understand either view - failure does not invite further investment, and Trek has survived far worse instalments in Trek than the recent ones.
That’s a delusional way to think. I highly doubt “real Trek” would come back if Discovery were cancelled. It would probably be the end of Trek for about 10 to 20 years.
"Real Trek" will never come back.
That's the joke.
Yeah, even if it came back as a total Berman clone taking place after VOY, there would be a vocal contingent complaining about it (probably including a lot of the folks that dislike Discovery).
Any idea of 'Real Trek' is nauseating as there is no such thing.
Dude, I just ate.
So, is the idea that ST: V is considered 'Star Trek' (IMO)
Like I said, I just ate!!So, is the idea that ST: V is considered 'Star Trek' (IMO)
No, anything called Star Trek V is not Real Trek™! Both the movie STV and the TV Show ST:V
Also the title of a mirror universe robert palmer song
