The only reason I knew it was him (before he spoke) was because I had watched the interviews with the cast, and yeah, his voice doesn't fit his appearance.He's not really what I thought of when heard his voice.
It's probably a fair observation, but frankly, I have to think it's because there's so many damn commercial breaks. They wouldn't need to put you back on the ship, but for a couple times (Like the old TNG days), if they weren't constantly pulling you out of it for breaks
I don't watch much network tv. Are these REALLY "limited" commercial breaks like the show claims at the top?
Hey, let's nitpick what an operational disaster rain on the ship's bridge would be!![]()
I know right? It's this sort of idiotic cutaway gag that MacFarlane pulled right out of Family Guy that has no place in Real Science Fiction. I mean, really? This guy expects to be taken seriously and he's having weather taking place on a starship bridge. I can only respect proper science fiction, like Star Trek which would never do anything as downright silly and insulting as raining on the bridge. Star Trek knows there's no weather on board a starship.We have to.
So much on this episode was so unrealistic.
Just lazy writing, man.
It was probably offensive somehow too. I haven't figured out how, yet, but I will. It's important.
If anything it always irritated me when TNG (or any Star Trek, really) had a perfectly serviceable character oriented character piece that got a sci-fi/space subplot sandwiched in because "it has to be science fiction. It has to have space stuff." If Orville wants to have plain ol character drama in space, that's both fine and encouraged.I like my Science fiction to have some occasional actual Science Fiction beyond, "...and it's IN SPACE!". This was worse than the worst of TNG when that show went down a similar route of an episode plot you could have seen on "Family Ties". Hell, at least when TNG did this story (TNG S4 - "In Theory") there was an actual Science Fiction B plot with a Dark Matter Nebula that cost a few crew here and there.
I could sworn I saw water hitting and pooling up on the panels, but maybe not then.So the bridge did not get wet, just the actors:
https://twitter.com/TomCostantino/status/1091215661605552128
How many people consider their interpersonal relationships to be low-stakes really?You sir, have no soul.
Seriously though, this was a SFnal episode. While it centered on low-stakes interpersonal drama, it would have been impossible to do on a non sci-fi show, because so much of it was wrapped up in the "fish out of water" status of Isaac.
I'll take this over "anomaly of the week" any day. Largely because there's a finite number of sci-fi plots you can really do, and Trek has done most of them to death already. What makes plots interesting is the characters embedded within them. And this episode had character in spades.
No, I saw that too. If you read the first comment, it says that they also built a bit of a mock-up stage and then combined all the things. So that one panel might have been real and included by CGI.I could sworn I saw water hitting and pooling up on the panels, but maybe not then.
Damn, this was a really fine episode! Though superficially similar to TNG In Theory, it really came at the material in a fresh and enjoyable way. And I got to say, Isaac in underwear on the couch with a beer is the funniest thing I've seen in a long time.
That's because it's funny when Bortus does it. Bortus is a straight laced character who takes things way too literally sometimes, so it's nice to tweak him. Look at how Malloy is represented, and he's fully human.I'm not a fan of the new security officer, the show doesn't need another detached wisecracker.
Also Alara was right, they use the alien characters as a circus act. They go to the "It's funny when Bortus does it" well way too often.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.