Why’s that? It’s smaller than most ships, especially with no stardrive.
Smaller how? She's beamier than the other two Excelsior kitbashes, because of the pylon structure. It's equally long. Having a bit less actual internal volume would not have served your purported story purpose - this would not make the ship look smaller in comparison with Sisko's.
I disagree completely.
You can't - it's the real world I'm referring to here. There, ships do come in all sizes and their hulls are identical in observable design. Basically because real ship hulls are extremely simple in geometry. Much like starship saucers, come to think of it.
They were considered the best of the lot? Certainly the Centaur is a fan-favorite, and the Curry is bigger/later-era than the Jupp, suggesting a greater threat/loss.
Might well be. Would be interesting to know. Probably won't be revealed, ever. The Curry being by Curry sounds like a good bet to me.
Except the Yeager was not an original well-crafted design like the Miranda and the biggest mismatch in Trek history?
What mismatch? She features only late 24th century components as far as can be seen.
I mean, where’d all the pristine other ships come from, if things were so dire already?
One is tempted to think that non-pristine starships don't fly straight, which is why Janeway took such great pains to repaint after each week's adventure even when stranded far away from Fleet Reviews...
Timo Saloniemi