Hard call as I personally like both TNG variants. William Ware Theiss was a brilliant costumier, IMHO. The original's with the shoulder angles add to the liveliness of the entire outfit, but the collars do offer a more "militaristic" look, while making actors look somehow taller. The midsection also being "collared" helps make what's otherwise a seam far less jarring.
Thank you,
@Armus, for posting the pics! Looking at them, I now see what you mean by "rushed design". I still like it but, yeah, if they were working on something entirely new then one has to wonder why they ended up sewing on the doggie collars onto them...
Had never seen the (sideless?!) outfit before. Still has those angles, but a larger color palette. And yeah, what the heck is that all about - cutting budget corners by cutting out the sides to show some side-ab for the actors? Then imagine everyone's confusion whenever a season 3 story with both style of uniforms being shown! Or, worse, the actors all waddle in on day one and are now wondering if TNG is produced by one of those frowned-upon "blue movie" studios...
Still, covering the sides with another toned fabric would have added some contrast. I'm now imagining season 3, like TBOBW, with everyone in that style uniform. But with sides covered too. The sense of action in those sporty uniforms does get heightened...
Any particular reason why a uniform like this would leave the chest uncovered on the sides?
Either to save on the budget, or because this isn't "Doctor Who" where they'll remove budgets from sets to ensure nobody walks around as TVMA -- unless the companion's name is "Peri", go figure -- to make it easier for Gorn to rip from the actor to not only keep the union from going absolutely spare but to reveal the actor's hairless chest as well?
And is it just me or does the sideless shirt blonde hunky guy with 1981 catalog-worthy hairdo have a nickel-plated, quite visible zipper down there?!