On the other hand, we see Micheal maneuver a series of events that completely alters (if not reverses) her worldview.
From believing she knows best to believing she knows best?
On the other hand, we see Micheal maneuver a series of events that completely alters (if not reverses) her worldview.
Anyone who can name another Star Trek character who went through more growth over the course of 15 episodes than Micheal Bunham gets a cookie.
Tom Paris went through Burnhams character arc in a single episode.![]()
Which is about as stupid and contrived as it gets. Settle him in so there's nothing unsafe the writers need to worry about. Yippee
You just think it's stupid and contrieved as it gets, because you don't like Tom Paris. So, naturally, you look for things to rationalize and justify your opinion.
#vgerlogic
![]()
Which is about as stupid and contrived as it gets. Settle him in so there's nothing unsafe the writers need to worry about. Yippee
To be fair, there was always a sense it was hanging over him, even seven years later. But it was very much a case of extraordinary times call for extraordinary measures...he is half way between maquis and Starfleet, and neither liked him much to begin with. Except for Tilly. I mean Harry.
Anyone who can name another Star Trek character who went through more growth over the course of 15 episodes than Micheal Bunham gets a cookie.
Right...I LIKED Paris, but to say he received a ton of growth and development is ridiculous.
He was one of the only relatable characters on the show.
I recently re-evaluated voyager, and to be fair, Tom Paris the settled early-stage family man, with friends and a place in things, is about seven hundred and fifty thousand light years from Tom the traitor, ex con, guilty, womaniser who doesn’t stay in one place long we see at the beginning of the series.
Right...I LIKED Paris, but to say he received a ton of growth and development is ridiculous.
Right, but he became that guy in like two hours. He got the trimmings to go with it, but gen was done being "edgy" or anything that would be risky by the end of Caretaker. IMO of course.
I have no Idea why you are so aggressive o_O. I said he went through the same character arc in the pilot. Started as a concivt, ended as an rehabilitated Officer/Hero-Type. Same as Burnham. Her arc was stretched out more, but that's not necessarily better, because things can get muddled, if the writers don't plan throroughly. Which... wasn't their strongest suite.
I dunno. I think it hung over him for a few episodes more at least, outside his cheer squad of janeway and Kim. And do we forget all the Delaney stuff or his Riker 101 stuff? The not very sensible Kes stuff? I think there’s a longer arc or three there to give the writers their credit.
I have no Idea why you are so aggressive o_O. I said he went through the same character arc in the pilot. Started as a concivt, ended as an rehabilitated Officer/Hero-Type. Same as Burnham. Her arc was stretched out more, but that's not necessarily better, because things can get muddled, if the writers don't plan throroughly. Which... wasn't their strongest suite.
Maybe that's why I liked him. A rare example of a 90s Trek character who felt like a real person.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.