Is Spectacle better than character development?

Discussion in 'Star Trek: Discovery' started by T'Boggan, Sep 23, 2018.

  1. T'Boggan

    T'Boggan Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Location:
    Washington England
    I have been enjoying Discovery but I feel the Visual aspects of the series as well as the grandiose nature of the story line is not allowing the characters to present a face that we can identify or sympathize with. I feel Character development is taking a back seat.
    Ok its the first season and we didn't get many episodes either, but to me The story was a real mess of Tech, visual splendor and Machismo.
    Also I am a bit tired of Massive battles, destruction and huge body-counts. Its amazing that any starship can navigate through they're universe what with all the trashed starship and bloated frozen corpses cluttering it up! Would the current audience for trek have the patience for a more personal Trek ? Even just to put the more dramatic storylines into context. I think they would.
     
  2. Tosk

    Tosk Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2001
    Location:
    On the run.
    No. It is not better.
     
  3. cultcross

    cultcross Postponed for the snooker Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Location:
    UK
    Strange choice of complaint for a show that has more character development than any other Trek first season by virtue of not using an episodic reset format.
     
  4. dahj

    dahj Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2003
    Why not both? It's not really an either-or thing...
     
    Irishman, Sci, Grendelsbayne and 2 others like this.
  5. mos6507

    mos6507 Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2010
    Convoluted plotting != character development.
     
    Josiana, ITDUDE and CaptainMurdock like this.
  6. cultcross

    cultcross Postponed for the snooker Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2001
    Location:
    UK
    Nobody said it did. "Character development" is about exploring and changing a character gradually as you go along. Evolving them like real people do as time goes along. Trek has generally not done a lot of that, preferring its characters to stay essentially the same. Major character events tend to be forgotten by the next week. Discovery is doing it much more than any previous Trek series, and in its first season too.
     
  7. Spider

    Spider Dirty Old Man Premium Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2004
    Location:
    Lost in time
    Characters are hit and miss because of the individuals (the viewers) with their own particular tastes judging the characters. There's not a Trek series made that didn't have characters I really liked and characters that I thought were just dumb mistakes. It's that balance and mixture of characters that throws individuals off.

    As to Discovery, I'm not interested in what's left of the Discovery crew after Lorca's demise, but the idea of Pike, Spock and Number One intrigue me. Maybe season two will improve for me, but who knows what the writers will cook up and serve. Whether you liked the first season or not, my bets are that season two will be much different in some manner. Just a prediction.
     
    Josiana, CaptainMurdock and Serveaux like this.
  8. Vger23

    Vger23 Vice Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2014
    Location:
    Enterprise bowling alley
    DSC seems far more character driven than any other series besides DS9.

    And no, spectacle never trumps character. That's why I love Star Trek so much.
     
    Turtletrekker and nightwind1 like this.
  9. Serveaux

    Serveaux Fleet Admiral Premium Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2013
    Location:
    Among the sellers.
    You can call what they do on this show "character development" if you like, but they write to the lowest common denominator to support the spectacle of nonsensical plot "twists." If Voq/whatsisname had turned out at some point to be able to unscrew and replace his head, that would have been consistent with the overall level of plausibility and narrative logic the series displayed...but doubtless the characters would have had feelings about it.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2018
    Josiana, CaptainMurdock and Jadeb like this.
  10. Mage

    Mage Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2007
    Yup, basicly that ended this topic. :)

    And no, spectactle is never beter. But when done right, they can both work together very well.
     
  11. Jadeb

    Jadeb Commodore Commodore

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2017
    That the format has virtues doesn't mean the show capitalized on them. I would go so far as to say that Discovery has the most ill-defined main cast at the end of the first season (or 13 episodes, if you prefer) of any Trek series ever. I couldn't begin to describe Burnham's personality (other than she likes speeches), couldn't tell you if Stamets is genuinely grumpy by nature or was just resentful, couldn't describe Culber as anything other than "concerned significant other." The only character that stands out is Saru, who is the most in the mold of previous Trek characters and goes through a very traditional Trek "character development." Same with Tilly: She ends up exactly where you'd expect.

    Other than Saru and Tilly, the characters are basically a blank slate for season two, which is both a blessing and a scathing indictment.
     
    Last edited: Sep 23, 2018
  12. STEPhon IT

    STEPhon IT Rear Admiral Rear Admiral

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2010
    Location:
    Sunny California
    Star Trek used to be a vast world where I could imagine living in, but ever since DS9, a brilliant idea in the beginning btw, paved the way to places where I would be scared to death to journey. The lack of vision from the mini brains in Hollywood can't understand the boredom their storytelling is driving. Massive battles, destruction, and constant death is not Star Trek, and with Discovery where the "in your face" catastrophes is the norm in every episode, there seemed in order to keep anyone's interest the production will have to up the angst. Like that episode in TNG "Hero Worship" where the Enterprise was hit by a wave front intensity, "Raise shields - Raise shields" as the ship continues to get pounded. Season 2 is in danger of being more of the same but faster and more intense. There's more to Star Trek than this shit.
     
    Josiana, T'Boggan and CaptainMurdock like this.
  13. NeoStar9

    NeoStar9 Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    May 18, 2017
    You can have both and I think Discovery shows you can have both. You do not need to choose between them. However if you want something to be successful and have people spend money on it today spectacle is a MUST. No one is going going to bother spending money on a show or film in huge numbers if it's not exciting to look at and watch.
     
  14. Kemaiku

    Kemaiku Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    It *tries* to be both. But it's spectacle is early 2000's fanboys style edgey. And it's characters are woefully written.

    It needed to work a lot harder balancing both.
     
    DS9forever, Josiana, jaime and 2 others like this.
  15. CorporalClegg

    CorporalClegg Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    Anyone who can name another Star Trek character who went through more growth over the course of 15 episodes than Micheal Bunham gets a cookie.
     
  16. T'Boggan

    T'Boggan Lieutenant Commander Red Shirt

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2009
    Location:
    Washington England
    A story can be exiting and epic without giving us PTSD! My feeling is that without getting to know and empathise with the crew members then the peril isnt as meaningfull. Every story doesnt have to have Galactic consequences. "They who save one life in time saves the world" ;)
     
    Josiana and CaptainMurdock like this.
  17. Kemaiku

    Kemaiku Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    Shran appeared in around 15.

    (You didn't say in a row)
     
    eschaton likes this.
  18. CorporalClegg

    CorporalClegg Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2001
    Well "saving the world" is part-in-parcel for Star Trek season finales. And Burnham's actions had a lot more to do with saving herself.

    He still doesn't come close. Plus, since the episodes weren't in a row (and spread out across several seasons), most of his "growth" happened off screen.

    On the other hand, we see Micheal maneuver a series of events that completely alters (if not reverses) her worldview.
     
  19. XCV330

    XCV330 Premium Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2017
    Location:
    XCV330
    Greeks kind of invented drama. They went to enormous technological leaps to keep the audience entertained. Stuff that wouldn't be reinvented for millenia to automate stages, wow the people in the stands, etc.
    We don't remember that bit but the plays are still performed today, usually in methods that would seem minimalist, or er.. spartan to viewers from that time, to appreciative non-rowdy crowds who won't wonder why everyone is being so calm and where the hell are the naked flute players.

    It's all important. The story, the character dvelopment is more important but they're both very important.
    If star trek took place in a blank set with drably attired people concentrating solely on the fundamentals, no one would watch, not even the smuggiest of the smug.
    DSC had plenty of character development.
     
    Vger23 and Ovation like this.
  20. Kemaiku

    Kemaiku Admiral Admiral

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2004
    Location:
    Northern Ireland
    Bigoted racist rando captain of any other Andorian ship that becomes the Ambassador of a whole species, helping found the entire Federation, changing views on not only one species but several. After losing a loved one and fighting to the death with said allies and overcoming even that rage.

    Burnham stumbled head first into a war, went whoopsie and kind of bumbled about some more, fell for a killer Klingon and...something.