I'll unequivocally give you Transformers! Megatron truly is the main villain in all those movies.
In the other cases, the "recurring villain" is just a recurring cast member, not the actual big antagonist of the following movies. Like Loki, who was the main villain in Thor 1 (and Avengers!), but in all subsequent appereances he was usually another character that took part in the story of taking the new big bad villain down.
(THough I haven't seen "Fantastic Beasts" yet. Does it count? It's not really an adaption, which follow other rules. But... kinda'? I don't know)
Also, as you can see: This is not a 100% tight rule. This is just a general observation, that action movies have a big new villain every movie that needs to be taken down. And that having an overall long narrative with a single, recurring villain or evil organization is clearly the exception.
Which I think is a pity. I loved that all Captain America movies have Hydra as a recurring villain organization, or how Sean Connery continuesly fought against SPECTRE. That doesn't work for all types of action movies - I think Spider-Man is better off facing against a unique, colorfull villain every movie. I just think a bit more variety overall would be nice.
Fantastic beasts sort of adapts the backstory and lore from the Harry Potter books ( and it’s tiny sort of spin off book that isn’t. More of a novelty item.) and then pumps it into some world tour stuff. In terms of adaptation from its titled source material....it makes the Hobbit look like a concise summation. But to be fair, it’s like a movie adaptation of a pamphlet...and is actually a fairly good film, albeit one that gets further and further from the source from which it sprang.