We all know that the real truth is that the Prime Star Trek Universe is balanced on the backs of 4 elephant-shaped universes(TMP, TNG, ENT, DSC), which are standing atop a giant turtle-shaped universe(TOS).
This is the REAL Objective TRUTH and anyone who says otherwise is a ninny.
Since there's about 50 threads on how and why this universe is different from that universe, or how this doesn't fit into that timeline, I figured it might be fun to have one thread where we can collect all the theories that unify this supposedly fractured universe.
So, Prime Universe is a homogeneous mass consisting of TOS, TAS, ST I-VI, TNG, ST Gen-Nem, DS9, VOY, ENT and DSC. What are the most common complaints against this, and why are they wrong? What are the more obscure ones, and how are they fun?
(For professionals only: Could we even unify the Kelvinverse with the rest of it?
)
This is the REAL Objective TRUTH and anyone who says otherwise is a ninny.

Since there's about 50 threads on how and why this universe is different from that universe, or how this doesn't fit into that timeline, I figured it might be fun to have one thread where we can collect all the theories that unify this supposedly fractured universe.
So, Prime Universe is a homogeneous mass consisting of TOS, TAS, ST I-VI, TNG, ST Gen-Nem, DS9, VOY, ENT and DSC. What are the most common complaints against this, and why are they wrong? What are the more obscure ones, and how are they fun?
(For professionals only: Could we even unify the Kelvinverse with the rest of it?
